7 mo. ago • 100%

Beeper is now available, no waitlist!

blog.beeper.com Beeper is now available, no waitlist!

Beeper is (finally) out of beta. No more waitlist! Download the app today – it’s free.

Teknologi @feddit.dk Beeper is now available, no waitlist! [Paraplychatklient til iOS og Android]

Technology @lemmy.world Beeper is now available, no waitlist!

Android @lemdro.id Beeper is now available, no waitlist!

78 comments

There's a lot of FUD in this comments section, so I'd like to clear the air. I'm pretty big on OSS myself, so it pains me to see a company doing all the right things get lambasted like this.

Beeper is just a Matrix server running in tandem with a series of custom, open source bridges written by Beeper. The value proposition is not having to deploy a Matrix server yourself, and not having to deploy each bridge yourself.

However, if you want to do that you absolutely can. I've been running Synapse + a subset of their bridges for a couple years now (the WhatsApp one being the oldest), and they are fantastic.

The devs contribute back to Matrix all the time and are great about supporting the spec as a responsible third party.

Their only closed source software is their client, which is - by definition - only written to work with their servers and not generic Matrix servers (e.g. It's just a preconfigured matrix client which expects each bridge to be deployed, and doesn't ask you for things like what server you want). As a result, you wouldn't want to use it with your own stack; you can just pick one of the myriad OSS clients available for Matrix and go with that. I use SchildiChat, for example.

I don't understand why, after doing all this work and publishing the source online for free (free as in freedom), they aren't allowed to offer a preconfigured service to non tech savvy folk?

Honest question: Shouldn't they be paid for their work?

Edit: And, please, stop asking questions like "How do they connect to X/Y/Z, anyway?" - just go read the source and see for yourself. These are the good guys working completely in the open, and you're treating them as if Twitter just wrote a chat app.

86
- Not sure there is much FUD, let me see if I can sum up the points:
  
  Beeper devs have written a bunch of bridges between Matrix and other services. ✅ Cool
  
  They've contributed to Matrix. ✅ Cool
  
  End-to-end encryption, ends at each bridge server, which needs to decrypt and re-encrypt every message (¹). ❌ Not cool
  
  They're OpenSource, so anyone can self-host their own bridge. ✅ That's cool... but contrary to the "value proposition" of not having to do so 🤷
  
  Encryption in anything closed source, like their client, is ❌ not cool... but you can use a different client, so 🤷
  
  Decryption on not-selfhosted servers, is ❌ not cool... but you can self-host them, so 🤷
  
  All clients come "preconfigured" for some service 🤷, but theirs is locked to a service. ❌ Not cool
  
  People using a client with E2EE, get that expectation broken by Beeper (client) users giving their keys to a bridge hosted by a 3rd party. ❌ Not cool
  
  FUD: The devs' monetization strategy isn't clear. ("premium features" in the client? 🧐)
  
  TL;DR: Sounds like a reasonable way to move unencrypted messages around... but falls short of fixing the problem of having secure interoperable E2EE.
  
  Should they get paid for it? Probably, if you find that useful.
  
  (¹: if there is any bridge capable of forwarding encrypted messages without decrypting, please correct me)
  
  20
  
  The not cool parts just relate to any sort of hosted bridge. If you don't trust them with decrypting messages on their end, then don't give them your data - there are no bridges capable of doing that, anywhere.
  
  So it really comes down to "trust someone else with your data, or host it yourself"; and if you're - understandably - frustrated with those options blame companies like WhatsApp or Discord that make it nigh impossible to integrate their services with outside networks.
  
  Functionally, these bridges just forward your content to a library acting like a headless client - there's no way to encrypt that as the reverse engineered clients are not libraries and need to take raw input. You can't end to end encrypt it as the client is one of the "ends".
  
  As an example, the WhatsApp bridge uses WhatsApp web as a backend, and has all the limitations of WA web.
  
  As a result, I find the expectations to be a bit unrealistic.
  
  4
  
  Does the whole encryption/decryption thing still bother you if you self host?
  
  I tried out the app, the value there is that it's ready to go straight away, though I took it all down again because my messages being unencrypted on someone else's server makes me uneasy. May end up self hosting it for that reason and not using anything closed source
  
  2
- All of that needed to be said. Thank you.
  
  15
- Seems like they did good until now. I'm not confident, even skeptical, that will keep going after the acquisition though.
  
  Gravatar was a great, independent, minimal service. Now it's a horrendous, bloated service.
  
  4
  
  I hope they continue to do good, but am also skeptical.
  
  And, man, I miss the old Gravatar.
  
  2
Permanently Deleted

32
- Honestly I understand where you're coming from but I'm going to be a bit pragmatic, it's free, it centralizes all my shit chat apps into one "shit app" (the app is excellent so far) I won't bridge it to signal because that would be my safe app but for insta, messenger, Discord, telegram and even SMS/RCS I have no issues
  
  7
  
  Permanently Deleted
  
  7
- A message from tumbler's CEO
  
  5
  
  Love the CEO sketches! And they're not even in the top five things Brennan has done, probably!
  
  2
  
  Wow! That's one annoying video!
  
  1
Bought by Automattic? After they non-consensually took all of Tumblr and hosted Wordpress to train AI? And after their big boss revealed his transphobia? I guess i'll skip this one

29
- Gravatar was a great, minimal, independent service. Until they acquired it and integrated it into their WordPress platform and onboarding (trying to get you to become a customer).
  
  3
  
  Dammit yes! Mandatory shot out to David Revoy and his replacements of it (and the blog post where he mentions how he divested himself of CDNs).
  
  1
Be so nice to notify your contacts about breaking e2ee then, will ya

17
- The Android version has a local bridge that does not break ee2e for Signal. It is an experimental option, but it was easy to turn on and use
  
  1
  
  It's nice that the option exists, I didn't know that. But I have to say, I'm still not a fan of the overall concept of bridges
  
  1
That seems really exciting! But don't services like Discord forbid third party clients?

15
- But don’t services like Discord forbid third party clients?
  
  Me waiting for inflation to slowly increase Discord's yearly revenue until it tips into the legally defined Gatekeeper™ status under the EU Digital Markets Act so they'd be playing with fire if they banned people for using interoperability apps.
  
  16
- I've been using Beeper with a Discord bridge for three years now. No problems.
  
  11
- Beeper isn't a Discord client.
  
  6
  
  Kind of is though, if it quacks like a duck
  
  1
How is beeper reading my Discord DMs without breaching Discord TOS?

e: Their ToS and privacy clauses are way too opaque for something that's not open source. No from me, Ma'am.

10
- Permanently Deleted
  
  16
  
  I've already had Discord accounts snupped out from under me for not giving them my phone number, I don't wanna give them a real reason to ban me 😅
  
  5
  
  Discord's own Linux client is kinda ass and keeps breaking my build using old insecure electron versions/forcing you to update before you can use the app while not being up to date in my package manager
  
  Gotta use a custom client anyway to keep my sanity intact
  
  3
- I've been using a Discord bridge with Beeper for three years with no problems.
  
  9
  
  That's not what I asked
  
  20
- It's open source, here's the code. It uses the discordgo library to connect to Discord and read your DMs.
  
  e: You're free to download and deploy the source yourself, and write your own ToS. That's the nice part of open source software.
  
  6
  
  That's the source code for the Discord bridge, I'm talking about Beeper
  
  4
Another closed source chat app? Yeah, no thanks.

Anti Commercial AI thingy

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

9
- Not closed source. It's just a Matrix server instance running their own bridges. All the backend stuff is open source, the only closed source part is their client.
  
  The client is specific to their site and unnecessary: just deploy Synapse, then pick and deploy the bridges of their suite you want to your server. You can then pick and use any of the available Matrix clients to get the same exact features. You can even sponsor them on Github, as I've been doing for months.
  
  13
  
  the only closed source part is their client.
  
  Which is exactly what I'm referring to. Plus, they can say they run a matrix server, but if your frontend is closed source, there's no way I trust that they actually do run a fully opensource backend. Wouldn't surprise me one bit to hear/read that they have closed source components in the backend too. Big nope from me.
  
  Anti Commercial AI thingy
  
  CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  
  9
Alright, I got to ask. Having one app for all these services sounds great. I remember some drama around it though, don't recall the details. So what am I missing, is this actually good news?

Its not open source but neither are most of the apps it connects to.

Edit: Found a comment in another thread that sums up valid concerns https://feddit.nl/comment/8763492

9
- See this comment by @derin@lemmy.beru.co
  
  4
thanks but I don't need this proprietary shit

8
- It's not proprietary, lol. You can download and deploy each of their bridges yourself to your own servers.
  
  Source: been using their WhatsApp, Discord, and Signal bridges for over a year. I use Github sponsors to pay for development, as I appreciate how great they are.
  
  The only closed source part of their stack is their client, which you don't have to use.
  
  Also, they're some of the most prolific contributors to Matrix outside of Element. The emoji picker in Element was literally PR'ed by Tulir.
  
  Love it when folk see people trying to make money off OSS and immediately resort to hysterics. It really makes closed source development look appealing if you're going to be damned by idealogues regardless of whether you release the source or not.
  
  23
I guess I can finally use proper WhatsApp web on iPad 😂

6
Discord? Not working (probably because of TOTP)

Facebook Messenger? Not working (probably because I use it without Facebook account)

SMS/RCS? Not working (looks like it requires Google account)

Seems like it's not ready yet
5
Obligatory https://xkcd.com/927/

5
- This is not applicable here, since Beeper is "just" Matrix + Bridges + Simplified UX!
  
  13
  
  Indeed. More like talking 14 competing standards and shoving them under one gui... and I'm here for it. I miss the days of trillian and gaim.
  
  15
Sadly doesn't appear to be usable for SMS by Google Fi users who have web sync enabled. Guess I'll be holding off.

4
I wish there was an web app.

4
- There is, they just don't publicise it. Actually one of my favourite features of the service tbf. Just load up a web page and all my messages are there, regardless of where they came from.
  
  3
  
  Link is incorrect.
  
  2
Add iMessage and Viber and I'm in.

3
Without iMessage, right?

3
- Some self-hosters have been able to get iMessage working.
  
  4
What is it lol

2
- Unified chat app...combines almost all chat networks into one.
  
  5
  
  Thanks buddy
  
  3
Unless I am missing something, it did not send Signal messages to Android Auto, and that is kind of a deal breaker for me.

1

You've viewed 78 comments.