Jokes on you. I'm a Machinist and that feature on the drawing has an perpendicularity GD&T callout of +- 1deg. In spec is in spec. Ship it!!!
73ReplyIt's 87 degrees
11ReplyNo, no- it's the design engineer who is clearly wrong.
7Reply
I like this positive attitude!
11ReplyFull send
3Reply
As long as it's perfectly 89° it's fine. That's acute angle.
60ReplyIt's very well drawn too, no overshooting on the edges. Looks good to me.
16ReplyIt's 87
11ReplyBarely acute 😳
2Reply
Engineers: Eh, close enough.
30Replyshrugs Same order of magnitude
12Reply
Is it exactly 89°?
24ReplyNo. It's wrong, too. Have a nice day :)
44ReplyI saw this before and if I remember correctly, it's more like 87°.
28ReplyNo. It measures about 87°.
13ReplyWtf?! The fact that OP got it wrong is even more disturbing!
4Reply
I didn't know 1° difference would be this noticeable. I am very disturbed.
24ReplyIt's noticable cos its 87 degrees not 89.
18Reply
Guys it’s actually 90° but the photo is taken on an angle.
22Reply90° isn't any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°.
So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.
19ReplyIt's supposed to be 89° but is actually 87°. So it qualifies as imperfect.
7ReplyLove it (after I confirmed it to be true via the rotate function in the photo editor)
3ReplyOh shi-
2Reply
More concerned about why you wasted all those colors on this image when two was sufficient?
17ReplyAhhh, I love it when the 89 degree angles are perfectly 89 degrees.
15ReplyI’ll see you in hell
10ReplyGrabbing my phone protractor now.....brb
9ReplyYou should have put the little square thing in the corner to indicate a right angle!
6ReplyWish i didn't see this
5ReplyAnybody who posts images like this have a special position in hell
3Reply
It's still perfect since you can just take 32040 of these (= 89*360, ggt is 1 since 89 is prime) and then you will have a full circle. A real shame it would have been when you would have took an irrational amount of degrees since then this calculation would not be possible. There could only be an approximation that makes it impossible in reality to decide if it is right or not but mathematically speaken it would be impossible.
5ReplyI can't believe you've done this
5ReplyI prefer the 91° version
4ReplyThat's not right.
4ReplyYou evil son of a witch.
2ReplyAfter reading the title I internally thought: "fuck!"
2ReplyNot a whole circle? BASTARD!
1ReplyDon't let perfect be the enemy of good.
1ReplyYou monster.
1ReplyPermanently Deleted
1Reply