This is funny, but It's not about women's bodies. It's about creating desperation among those they exploit.
Its about keeping the poor the pliant, submissive playthings and capital batteries of the owners.
In addition to making women desperate with children they can't afford, the unwanted child will almost never have any option but to labor for the owner class. The more desperate the peasants are, the less they'll accept for their exploited labor.
The Federalist Society that now owns our Judicial branch is nothing less than an arm of our owner class.
The owners also love to use their media machine to turn every conceivable demographic against one another so we never look up at our common enemy. Women and men should be angry at just about everything the SCOTUS is doing, both for themselves and their children.
The women on the court, and the affluent women this court represents the interests of don't consider peasant women that have to suffer these rulings to be human at all. Socioeconomic status at the true owner level transcends all other conflicts, because it either creates or greatly exacerbates all of them. Just ask Clarence Thomas.
They can propagandize the races/sexes/religious followings to beat eachother to death with their media machines, but whether we get our shit together and fight the owners, or keep taking the bait and beating on one another as they laugh, the conflict is the tiny class of owner capitalists vs. Everyone else.
My point is while the decision might please the poor trailer park misogynists and religious zealots, and the fight between women and them is stoked by for profit media to keep the peasants divided, the court made that decision to further the long term economic interests of the owners concerned with their nepo babies not having enough cattle to exploit.
It was done in the interest of greed for our owners. Women being angry at laughing trailer park misogynists and religious zealots might be cathartic, but people like Warren Buffett are the ones it was done for.