1 yr. ago • 100%

95% of NFTs are Worthless: Report

petapixel.com 95% of NFTs are Worthless: Report

Crypto crashed and brought NFTs with it.

59 comments

There must be a 5% margin of error

108
- You laugh now but you'll be crying when they build cryptoland and my blockchain hills nft goes to the moon!
  
  20
- The only way I'd believe a 5% margin of error would be if the report said 105% of NFTs are worthless.
  
  2
Only 95?

105
- i can only presume the remaining 5% is owned by NFTs Georg, who lives on the blockchain and is an outlier who should not have been counted
  
  57
  
  I was gonna say! Can't forget about NFTs Georg!
  
  2
- Hey, just because 95% of them are worthless, doesn't mean the other 5% aren't too.
  
  5
  
  Maybe those NFTs have negative value.
  
  3
- It's a lowball estimate.
  
  2
The news here is that, contrary to popular belief, 5% of NFTs actually still hold some value.

81
- The real question would be: how many of those 5% can be sold for more than the initial asking price.
  
  ...but NFTs were never for the buyers, they were for the creators: even if they fall to 1/1000000th the initial value, a 2.5% cut on every sale is still more than 0.
  
  10
  
  If the values fall low enough relative to transaction fees then there won't be any transactions at all for creators to collect royalties. Also values can drop to literally $0 if it isn't even worth a buyer or sellers time to deal with the NFT (i.e. seller can't find buyer at any price or doesn't bother trying).
  
  7
The other 5% are less than worthless

51
i assumed it was 100%

35
- probably a 5% error margin.
  
  8
- For those of us with even an inkling of common sense it might as well be lol
  
  7
With some more time, the other 5% will follow suit.

24
Shocked it’s not 100%

23
This means that 79% of all NFT collections – otherwise known as almost 4 out of every 5 – have remained unsold

Anyone taking bets on how much of the remaining 21% were "sold" on paper only ie. wash traded? None of these statistics were ever reliable. Hundreds of thousands of NFT collections minted, almost all of them fishing for a single sucker to bite and make it worth the gas costs. It would probably be more useful to look only at collections officially associated with some already well-known brand/artist/celebrity.

19
- It would probably be more useful to look only at collections officially associated with some already well-known brand/artist/celebrity.
  
  The Trump NFTs sold 100%... not sure how useful is that.
  
  9
  
  I honestly love that statistic. It's like a venn diagram of Trump screwing people over, people dumb enough to buy NFTs, and Trump supporters. It looks like this 🔴
  
  18
Along with the rest of crypto, but don’t tell them…

19
- No, you can't paint that broad of a stroke. It's true that crypto INVESTING might be no better gambling, but crypto wasn't invented to be an investment tool, it was invented to be a financial transaction tool, and in that regard it has some real utility.
  
  13
  
  But that's not how most people use it anymore. It's become almost entirely a speculation market. Plus, transaction times for payments on Bitcoin e.g. make it totally infeasible for use in any retail application.
  
  It's just a bunch of people passing Monopoly money around to each other at this point, trying to pretend they're making bank.
  
  20
  
  No, they made it to be an investment tool from the start. They wanted it to be a new gold standard, where the limited resource increases in value over time. Completely ignoring history on why that is a bad idea. It's was created to be the ultimate, "I got mine, so fuck you!"
  
  17
  
  it was invented to be a financial transaction tool
  
  Which it failed at
  
  15
  
  Negative utility is still utility, right?
  
  11
- As with everything else, it only holds the value we assign to it
  
  5
  
  You may not mean it this way, so no offense intended either way, but...
  
  Crypto bros love to say "Oh, the value of any currency is arbitrary, it's all just based on people believing that it's worth something!"
  
  But you know why I prefer transacting in USD? Cuz on a yearly basis, the government comes asking for a certain amount from me, and they'll only take USD. And if they don't get it, they'll do all sorts of bad things to me.
  
  So while I may think gold or Dogecoin or limited edition Beanie Babies are a superior medium of exchange, I still have an unavoidable need to acquire USD. It's not my belief in USD that gives it value -- it's the guy with the sword.
  
  Ironically, there is a similar way in which crypto has value. Cuz ransomware attacks tend to demand payment in crypto.
  
  So they did actually make a legitimate currency, but the value doesn't come from belief. It comes from blackmail.
  
  20
BREAKING NEWS Report “95% of water : wet”

19
- shit that would be breaking news if only 95% of it was wet lol
  
  9
  
  I guess really cold water isn't really "wet" per-se. What did I just write...
  
  5
  
  Note that it didn’t say the other 5% WASNT wet, just that 95% if it was.
  
  1
To the surprise of absolutely no one with more than three brain cells to rub together.

16
- I'm extremely surprised that the number is only 95%.
  
  8
Always have been 🌎👨‍🚀🔫

15
5% margin of error

13
100%

12
Who knew that implementing scarcity where there isn't any wouldn't work?

10
TL;DR: A recent report reveals that the NFT market has collapsed, with 95% of NFTs being practically worthless. The hype around NFTs peaked in 2021, but since then, interest has waned, leaving many artists and investors in a tough spot. While not all NFTs are scams, the majority have lost their value, and the environmental impact of crypto remains a concern.

5
Hey. I have an NFT of a bridge I'd like to sell you. Anyone interested?

5
- Send me a screenshot first.
  
  7
  
  You wouldn’t download a bridge would you?
  
  4
There must be a 5% margin of error

2
5% to go

2
Probably just the beeple ones? Or are they all worthless as well?

1
- Well they still have 0 practical use so yeah
  
  1

You've viewed 59 comments.