FBI busts musician’s elaborate AI-powered $10M streaming-royalty heist

arstechnica.com FBI busts musician’s elaborate AI-powered $10M streaming-royalty heist

Feds say it's the first US criminal case involving artificially inflated music streaming.

I am just impressed by the idea and execution. Just wow. Too bad he took it too far.

Technology @beehaw.org FBI busts musician’s elaborate AI-powered $10M streaming-royalty heist

Technik @feddit.org FBI busts musician’s elaborate AI-powered $10M streaming-royalty heist

News @lemmy.world FBI busts musician’s elaborate AI-powered $10M streaming-royalty heist

25 comments

Definitely an abuse of the system, but I'm struggling to see where criminal law says you can't make a bunch of fake accounts to listen to garbage music.

60
- In agreeing to be paid by music streaming platforms they almost certainly agreed not to do exactly this. Which makes it fraud.
  
  27
  
  Sounds like a breach of contract, which is a civil matter.
  
  16
- Fraud is pretty broad and covers most things that deliberately misrepresent reality to take money from someone else.
  
  25
  
  Yet advertising and billionaires exist. It's not what you do, it's what clique you're part of.
  
  8
- From justice.gov:
  
  SMITH, 52, of Cornelius, North Carolina, is charged with wire fraud conspiracy, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison; wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison; and money laundering conspiracy, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.
  
  16
  
  This is a ridiculous law, it might as well be called "money fraud". Justice is a bad joke.
  
  8
In a 2017 email to himself, Smith calculated that he could stream his songs 661,440 times daily, potentially earning $3,307.20 per day and up to $1.2 million annually.

Great idea, but why would you email yourself about it?

51
- I have a friend that I’ve tried to convince using a notes app, but he swears that emailing himself notes and to-do lists is more effective. He’s wrong, but to each their own.
  
  27
  
  Oh, sure. I get that. Sending yourself reminders is absolutely understandable. Sending yourself documented evidence of your plans to defraud someone is entirely different.
  
  10
  
  I mean, if you treat your inbox as a to-do list, that's not that far-fetched
  
  4
  
  Google keep used to (don't use it anymore) store your notes "backed up" by email. You could view all your notes in gmail.
  
  Maybe it was something like that?
  
  4
- Bio...graphy?
  
  3
They only take crimes against the rich seriously - what a joke of a country the US is.

12
- The better people.... Shiti organics just suck too much
  
  1
I've thought of this, but don't have the wherewithal to actually make a project come to fruition.

I'm also not a lawyer, but I've read multiple articles on this, and it doesn't seem like any legal violation. Corporation got lazy, didn't confirm where 10m in royalties went and under what circumstance, and got burned.

Finally a corp gets scammed by the common man.

I say good on him.

9
Great use of taxpayer money ,🤡

4
NGL... I'm upset I didn't think of this

2

You've viewed 25 comments.