Does anyone know how to cite this in a research paper?
Does anyone know how to cite this in a research paper?
Its only a delusion if you're wrong
25Reply"Revelation" was a good way to avoid delusion a couple thousand years ago
9Reply
That's how the shape of benzene was first theorised.
Here Kekulé spoke of the creation of the theory. He said that he had discovered the ring shape of the benzene molecule after having a reverie or day-dream of a snake biting its own tail (a symbol in ancient cultures known as the ouroboros).
24ReplyNot really, a day-dream is not a delusion
-2Reply
MLA format would be something like this:
Maneuver, The Picard. The Delusion. Picard, 2023.
Then, in your paper, to reference it, just write "(Maneuver 2023)".
17ReplyI like IEEE format, in text citations are just square brackets with a number [1]. Trust engineers to be
lazyefficient.Sources:
[1] https://ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/IEEE-Reference-Guide.pdf
11ReplyI have only known that as the Wikipedia format. But it's obviously the best format. Straight to the point and easy to write.
5Reply
Beautiful, lol
3ReplyYou can't though, unless said delusion was previously published. You can publish delusions, e.g., in an autobiography, a novel, or even a psychology thesis.
2Reply
Lmao "delusion" makes this
11ReplyPretend it's in the "supplementary information". Nobody reads it, with the exception of phd students
7ReplyAs a personal observation—"observation" vs "delusion" is a matter of perspective.
5ReplyThe fact that your observation turned out to be a delusion is irrelevant information
1Reply
Not a delusion but rather a dream in which August Kekulé found the chemical structure of benzene on his dream
3Replythe proper use of you're delusional.
2ReplyWell, in your delusion you were kind enough to give Dr. Manhattan some undies, so there's that.
2ReplyWe taught him shame
5Reply
Hmm. Ask a republican, this is right up their alley
2ReplyI wonder why that's so prevalent on the right.
1ReplyCuz they thend to be religious nuts, and that goes hand in hand with being very superstisous.
2Reply
I think you cite Emmitt Brown
2Reply