United we stand, divided we fall.

There are no gods to save us. We have to save ourselves. And that requires everyone working together. Including us and theists.

I am even happy to extend an olive branch to any evangelical that agrees to fight for progressive causes. They do exist believe it or not.

77

A motto of mine is "The universe doesn't care, so we have to".

Love seeing other versions of the same idea held by others.

40
- That is similar to one of mine. "The Universe, and Life are fair. They are completely impassionate about their fairness."
  
  I throw that at any one that dares utter the phrase "life isn't fair," at anyone else in my earshot. Through 44 years of life it seems that those that like the phrase "Life isn't fair," are the very ones working as hard as they can to ensure it is unfair.
  
  15
- We are the caring center of the universe.
  
  3
for real. folks, even if you're atheist or agnostic, make a note right now of the religious institutions in your community with pride flags, progress flags, coexistence symbols, and palestine flags (assuming they're not mosques, that will be a little trickier to get a read on, i'm not saying to hate a mosque with a palestine flag, it's just not intrinsically a symbol of coexistence in that context). these are people who root their love of you in a different place than you root your love of humanity, but they still love you and want you to be alive on this earth. an imperfect coalition is better than a compromised one.

18

That kid with the stick isn't helping. Gotta aim that thing higher.

49

That's right, teach science! It's under threat as well.

42
Seriously, that guy needs to raise his rod higher up between the gay rights into the back of the trans rights, or wedge it into the ground and post it up from behind. Maybe even think ahead, have the gay rights lean forward and create a type of A frame tower there he can use the rod for support

11
He's trying but yeah

3

Unfortunately, a threat to one group of us isn't actually a threat to all groups of us. So people can easily ignore where the threat is coming from.

7

This is true. You can threaten religious rights while supporting trans rights. You can threaten women's rights while supporting free speech rights. It's way more complicated than this.

3

None of that helps unless people also understand class solidarity, that we do not have allies in positions of power.

3

Palestine was in front before. Make of that what you will.

-3

careful; continuing to espouse reality will get you ostracized and eventually banned on .world and nevermind that ignoring similar constructive criticism is the reason why democrats lost the election.

1
- nah, that's more a thing of grad, it's pretty hard to get banned on .world imo
  
  -1

Isn't the idea of rights that they are endowed upon or imbued into each individual by some supernatural authority, like a god? I mean, aren't rights metaphysical, in that they are not context dependent, and exist even outside of time and space itself? Like, the idea of inherent individual rights is that you can remove a person from any given time and place, move that individual to any other time and place, and their "rights" would follow with them, not unlike a soul.

-19

Rights are what we agree to as a society.

The things you're describing aren't real.

21
- Well, I didn't construct this description out of thin air. It's based on how the concept of individual rights has been explained to me by various people over the years.
  
  -10
unfortunately, those are dignities, not rights. rights are a legal contract between you and your governing body. rights are granted. dignities are the things that are intrinsically connected to your personhood, your humanity, or both.

14
- So if your governing body decides you don't have rights, then you don't have those rights.
  
  Edit: it seems like rights are only available to people who have enough power, money, and/or influence over the state to persuade the state to grant them the rights they desire.
  
  7
This is not correct. Rights are a construct of human law that can be traced to a series of foundational legal documents and structures of government processes. It evolved out of the privileges given by royalty to variable degrees of their subjects into the ideas foundational to liberalism and other political philosophies of humanitarian ethics which established an idea of aspects of human life and choices that were sacrosanct from government interference or entitlements citizens have in their systems. You have probably heard of the phrase "God given rights" but that is more or less just a saying that came from the concept of rights becoming such a social norm that one considers them the air we breathe.

Religious individuals, from personal experience, tend to have an issue grocking the idea that ethics are not dependent on the idea of a God outright telling you what is good or bad - secular ethics isn't about what gets you punished or not by an authority. It determines what is correct based off of different rubrics based on the individual school of ethics one applies. More often ethical systems, including modern law systems, are based out of some idea of empathy towards harm and struggles in life divorced entirely from the idea of punishment by a divine being.

Rights are also place dependent because they are built into the law system of whatever country you are in. If you are in China for instance you do not have a right to free speech, the Government can censor you or exact retribution for trying to publish or communicate certain things. Like any law though just cuz it's on the books doesn't mean it's in play. Russia technically has a right to free speech but their courts basically ignore infringement on it when it suits them to do so.

There is an idea of an international code of human rights... But really it is still considered a lower priority than the idea of individual nation sovereignty so protection of those rights is toothless and it is effectively more like gold star guidelines put forward by committee than actual rules.

8
- It evolved out of the privileges given by royalty to variable degrees of their subjects into the ideas foundational to liberalism
  
  Seems like liberalism is falling out of favor these days.
  
  -2
It's a type of social contract. In the traditionalist culture, being non-secular, they ascribed it to "God", but, as you know, there is no God, so it was actually up to real people belonging to religious institutions, the clergy. Since the Enlightenment, people have tried to replace God with Nature; this has often been a bad joke with terrible consequences, but eventually secular paradigms took over and tried to reason the contracts into shape, to make them more consistent. There's a lot of philosophy about this and I can't summarize it as easily. But what you're seeing today with Trump and the traditionalists, this anti-secularism, is a desire to return to the pre-Enlightenment state with its contracts and monarchy and aristocracy determined by "God":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_chain_of_being

5
Rights have never been given, they've always been fought for by past generations, often via violence

1

Gay...

-21

Alt-right troll...

Seriously, just look at this guy's post history. Lots of thinly veiled transphobia, homophobia, and misogyny.

2
- What else might have been thinly veiled?
  
  -5

Imagine these words, but different pic. Just propaganda.

-35

It is true that it would be different if it were different.

28
I'm not following you.

14
- You have to admit that putting the words under a different picture would make it different. He's got you there! Don't try to wiggle your way out of it!
  
  14
Not all propaganda is bad.

13
- Sometimes it's just legitimate information.
  
  4