Jim Jordan fails again to win speaker gavel in second vote, getting less support than first try
House speaker vote live updates: Jim Jordan falls short of reaching majority a second time
I have to say. I never understood why the grandmother in "Mars Attacks" laughed so hard when they "Blew up Congress".
Now I do.
ACK ACK ACK ACK!
I still feel the same today after a third ❌ vote.
They get like $1,300/day for this?
Eat shit, Gym Jordan!
What a silly clown show. I sure hope the Democrats can retake the House; the cons are not fit to lead a popsicle stand.
I am hopeful that this will hasten the breakaway of the far right from the republican party into a completely new 3rd party. It seems like this would only help dems.
It would only help dems, which is why it's unlikely. Best thing we can hope for is the republican party is pushed further right, which leads to the democrats absorbing even more center-right politicians, and then we have a few decades of milquetoast Democratic dominance until something big changes the dynamic.
At this point the only way out of this is for independents to not vote for Republicans but vote for Democrats instead.
At the moment there are no independent representatives in the House. We have two vacancies, but it's one Democrat and one Republican.
If you mean in the long run, at the next election, sure; but we can't wait that long for this mess to be sorted out.
At the moment there are no independent representatives in the House.
Actually, I was speaking about independent voters, not members of the House or Senate.
Thank you, Rep. Gaetz, for the opportunity to see the GOP in a lose-lose situation.
The circus continues 🤡
Kek. The US Republican can't stop shooting itself in the foot, even as its Israeli ally is crying for help. If I am Netanyahu, I'll get new allies.
It's absurd that we require a majority vote for house speaker. It should be as simple as whoever gets the most votes. Or you have to vote for A or B for your vote to even be counted. None of this "present" nonsense.
212 vs 199, ok Hakeem Jeffries wins.
Plurality voting is one of the best systems if your goal is to elect someone that most people don't want.
Most likely, this would make the Republicans vote for whoever their candidate is, rather than a minority Democrat winner.
Not saying I disagree with you per se. I had the same thought when reading this news.
The current system was probably designed to promote compromise, even across party lines. But we all know how well that's working out these days.
This is such a bad idea. Do you think people would vote the exact same way if this was how it works instead?
Majority vote would lead to even more deadlocks and partisanship
That Trump endorsement sure is powerful.
14 more to go to break McCarthy's record.
This time they don’t have the shitlicking wannabe propaganda minister Cucker Tarlson weighing in and putting his thumb on the scale in favor of the Qult45 candidate.
Oh wow, I'd forgotten all about that guy
What a fucking pedofilic treasonous loser.
Maybe his campaign should ramp up the threatening texts to his cohorts.
He went from 200 the first round to 199 the second.
Give it up Gym. The Democrats have the high ground.
Please drop out, Jordan. You don't belong anywhere near the levers of power.
Bwahahahaha! And I can't stress this enough: hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
This was the title NBC News put when I hit the share button. If it changes later I can change it here too.
Editable titles on posts. What a time to be alive!
The second season of “lol these fucking idiots” is already even better than the first
LMAO
I had guessed that he'd get fewer votes partially as a meme but it actually happened!
At this point I think the Israel conflict is going to force enough House Republicans to elect Jeffries so they can react to the situation and potentially give aid.
"Republican infighting causing dysfunctional House prevents aid to Israel after Hamas attack" is not a headline that I think even their voters want to see.
Monty Python presents: Jim Jordan Falls Short Again
Thoughts and prayers
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Last night, she criticized Jordan in a tweet and said she planned to "vote present or propose another name, if needed procedurally, until Jim reconciles with members."
"While the Republican candidate for speaker is making late night backroom deals to secure the gavel, Leader Jeffries has once again extended the hand of bipartisanship for a path forward," he said.
Jordan is the only candidate in the race for House speaker, but he’s still struggling to win enough support from rank-and-file Republicans to get elected in a formal floor vote.
In addition to Kelly, there are several Republicans on board with the idea of formalizing McHenry’s powers, including Reps. Ken Buck of Colorado, Dave Joyce of Ohio, Carlos Gimenez and Mario Diaz-Balart, both of Florida, and Lori Chavez-DeRemer of Oregon.
“After two weeks without a speaker of the House and no clear candidate with 217 votes in the Republican conference, it is time to look at other viable options," Joyce told NBC News.
Jordan has distanced himself from some of the hardball tactics of his allies and supporters — some of whom have engaged in a very public pressure campaign online and in conservative media against his political opponents.
The original article contains 2,391 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 92%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I think the democrats should nominate Trump, so the house GOP can tear itself apart deciding whether to vote for or against him.
Or offer to vote in a compromise candidate, then immediately file a motion to vacate the second he's been elected, and have the GOP vote against their candidate again.
Sounds like they could easily solve this problem by making Hakeem Jeffries speaker.
Honestly, it could be a real power move for some blue state republicans to flip parties. If they could pull a Reagan and say that the Republican Party has changed but they haven’t, they could take both the democratic voters and centrist republicans while losing the MAGAs, and still carry their district.
That would be something for the history books.
I doubt they would be trusted at this point. Too many burnt bridges in the MAGA lifetime. They are on life support.
They don't even have to flip outright to Democrats, they could simply announce they are now Independent. They are probably getting a Primary challenger regardless, and maybe Democrats pay back the favor by forgetting to run a candidate in that district.
What share of Republican voters are flexible enough to decide to vote for the Democrats just so they don't support the Trump/MAGA movement? Because these people would need need to decide to vote Republican come next election and US electors seem to be very entrenched in their support for one party or the other, no matter what...
It could, but brass tacks: Who are these people? I mean which Reps could survive jumping ship here with their political careers intact? I'm genuinely curious because I love the idea. I just don't see it for the same reason I don't see a single Dem flipping to get a more center Republican speaker.
If you defect, you basically have to swap parties entirely, because you're not just signing up for the Speaker. You also have to expect to protect him or her from the next motion to vacate. And the next. So in for a penny, in for a pound.
This is the same reason it takes a majority to elect the Speaker in the first place: Otherwise you have a House with a Speaker that still can't actually govern.
In my opinion there's no chance of that happening. The next speaker will definitely be a republican.
I'm just saying, it's an easy solution. Only takes a few Republican votes.
There are Republicans where they were able to win their seat but Biden won the general. They might be feeling purple.
Even tactically it would be the smart move for the Republicans.
If nothing gets done, they can blame the Democratic speaker, if things get passed the wingnuts don't like, they can blame it on the Democratic speaker, meanwhile, the republicans from the slightly more swingy states get creds with more moderate voters, when they vote sensibly.
But nooo, Republicans can only stand either having it all or blocking it all.
Good points, but any Republican who votes for a Democrat would see the entirety of the MAGA base vote against them. Hell, McCarthy got ousted for just negotiating with Democrats to avoid a shutdown. None of them are going to vote for Jeffries.