Where are all the successful "red cities"?
Where are all the successful "red cities"?
It's become somewhat of a meme now when there is a story on crime, or other bad things happening in a city, people pipe up and say "That's how it is in blue cities!" "This could only happen in a Democrat city!" However, I noticed they never say "... and that's why only want to live in X" or "... that would never happen in Y".
If living in "blue cities" are such a nightmare, where are all these Utopian "red cities" that people are apparently in favor of?
the funny thing is... getting people to live closer together encourages empathy.
living in the middle of nowhere reduces empathy... this is why people living in bumfuck are empathy-lacking tools calling themselves 'conservatives'
It seems like a lot of the time they are like "boy, crime is higher".... but if you live in a city that's just a fact of life. It's pretty obvious that there will be less crime out in the sticks. I wouldn't really attribute this to any "blue" policies.
Part of "less crime in the sticks" is a population effect. The rate of violent crime in New York City is 494/100,000 people. The rate of violent crime in the whole state of Alabama, from its stickiest sticks to the 225,000-resident Huntsville metropolis, is 404/100,000, which isn't that different, in my book.
I wouldn't say there is less crime out in the sticks. But there's less detected crime out in the sticks.
We also see that rural crime is undercounted, underreported. Many studies show that (sometimes) rural areas have more crime. Of course it varies by time and location and depends how you define everything.
It's usually lower per capita. Right wing media likes to report in nominal numbers, because have 10 crimes sounds like a lot more than 2 crimes. But when you see it's 10 out of 1000 (1%) people vs 2 out of 50 (4%) it doesn't look as good.
I was biking a dirt road near my rural neighborhood and saw a sign at somebody's driveway that said "if you can read this you're within range" and wondered how country folk got the stereotype of being friendly and kind. I really miss living in the city.
propaganda from the movies and shows. probably they need economic businesses to thier area, so they make up an image so people would go there, but NOT LIVE THERE. Yellowstone being one of those shows, and many other shows make reference of "southern hospitality"
Not saying you're wrong, because I believe I've seen patterns like this (but can also think of quite a fee counter examples). But do you have any evidence for this, or is it just a hypothesis?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban%E2%80%93rural_political_divide
the empathy is an inference from a documentary i saw where people have had some success in rural communities changing hearts and minds by befriending them. it turns out its easy to lack empathy for people youve never associated with and you have always been told are less than yourself.
It's the opposite in Sweden. Countryside leans left and cities lean right.
what're you on about? the most voted party in all 3 big cities is the socdems, rural places are WAY WAY WAY more right leaning than urban areas.
i think there are different socioconomics in play in sweden. lots of real immigration management issues unlike the united states made up ones.
also, sweden is more than an order of magnitude different in size (< 5% actually) of the unites states. 'rural' sweden isnt the same thing as 'rural' US.
also, i doubt the swedish rednecks are thirsty to get back to their slaving roots.
and alot of people that live in the moutains are "cray cray" there was a post/thread on reddit where vairous people accounted men in the woods that were not right in the head, in large numbers.