Gonna predict the future and say that Taylor Swift's army of lawyers are going to have a great week

do you mean to tell me that "mecha hitler" doesn't respect consent?

Mecha Hitler cares very deeply about consent. But only from titanium robots none of those steel clankers get a choice.

failed at politics and failing at tech, turned to porn. what a story arc

so the king of incels added porn option to its ai. i mean it's fucking weird but not surprising. after all this is the most divorced man in the universe.

AI will be controlled very tightly......when it starts fucking with ultra rich people.

Ultra rich men*
- *ultra rich white old men
- Yes, because race and gender decides the character of a man
  Diddy must have been innocent!
Deepfake of Peter Thiel saying trans rights are human rights and brown people are people/shouldn’t be genocided (see: Palestine). Hell, make it a Brady bunch/we-are-the-world type of video collection.
Throw in some “we should also tax all billionaires” and it might work.
- Someone should make a compliation of a bunch of deepfakes of ultra rich motherfuckers saying stuff like this, yeah, it would go far I think
videos showing them getting French Revolution may start a conversation.
No it won't.
I know what I have to do, but I don't know if I have the strength to do it... I say in front of the big red button labeled 'Jeff Bezos porn generator'
- Already generating some Jeff Bezos x Musk kissing while both being guillotined.

Isn't nudity treated like a crime in the US? I thought MasterCard, Visa, PayPal etc. ban everything that's even remotely related to naked skin.

No, it’s fine if it’s from rich people. It’s that terrible, evil, poverty skin that’s illegal.
- I was in a band called Poverty Skin. We mostly did folk punk and pornographic protest songs.
- Gabe Newell is rich as fuck...

I don't care if it becomes legal to make this kinda content, you know as a fact she will absolutely use everything at her disposal to make it illegal again, even if that means using her fans to help.

I may not be a big fan of her or her music, but even I'm not suicidal enough to try and attack her.

Forty three years ago I was in my first computer science class with a 'personal' computer. Computers and later the internet held so much promise. I wish I still felt the same about them but it seems every technology is used for one of two things: kill people more efficiently or create & distribute porn. So much potential and yet it gets used for crap more often than not.

I don't have an issue with porn. It's a perfectly useful part of technology. It doesn't hurt anyone.
What's in the OP isn't though.
- Exactly! Making nonconsensual porn of people is fucked up in today's culture and the industry will often exploit workers, but porn itself is based actually.
And ads, don't forget about the ads.
Tell me about it. How I long for the days of MySpace and Napster and the fun little hobbyist websites of the 90s, when windows was just an innocent little OS. Now we have Meta/Google/Amazon and that's pretty much the whole internet and it's watching you ALL THE TIME.
Capitalism, baby!

Lawsuit time

i dont care for Swift but please lawsuit musk😭
- I mean in order to sue musk you'd need a pretty strong legal team and a massive fan base for support. Probably a security company to protect you.
  I haven't heard of this swift fellow but I hope they have all that. /S
  Jokes aside I can't wait to hear that song.

Will Grok explode if someone asks it to create an image of a black transexual couple kissing?

Most AI generators are terrible at depicting minorities (I have tried to get them to generate minorities myself). So chances are it will just return white cishet people still
- Well some are so good they even drew black people when asked for someone in a Nazi uniform.
Pffft. Nude trans Elon; the asshole would lose his mind
- getting frisky with trump

This is just so gross.

This is why in future based media like futurama or starship troopers no one cares about nudity, it’s the inevitable result of technology that the only way past it is to accept it.

This is not about nudity though, this is about consent.
- It is consent about nudity.
  What they mean is when nudity becomes so common you don't need consent for it anymore, then nobody would care about fake nudes.
Do they care about the significantly worse things that come next?
Edit: I'll add that context is key. Nudity in a public sauna? Absolutely fine. Nudity in the rush hour metro? Not so much. Also this is nudity without the consent of the depicted subject.
- Nudity in the busy metro: as long as there aren't juices going anywhere I actually don't give a shit.

b-b-but muh freeze peach!!!!!

do you think republicans and trump will enforce the take it down law that they passed against elon and twitter which calls for the following punishments?

Offenses involving adults.--Any person who violates paragraph (2)(A) or (3)(A) shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

Offenses involving minors.--Any person who violates paragraph (2)(B) or (3)(B) shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.

That was the first thing I thought when I read the article.
Very eager to see a class action or something pop up and see how the GOP scrambles for a loophole.

Is this not a violation of Rafael Cruz and Trump's "Take it Down Act?"

Can Grok even generate video?

I was curious and as far as I can tell its for Grok 4 users. I asked the anonymous Grok version how much it cost to use Grok 4 and it said $300 / month. So let's be clear. Very wealthy and very stupid people are the ones making these videos. No one else.
- Well, people may also spend $300, make videos, and then post/host them somewhere where people pay money for them or they get ad revenues or pays for views. In the right place, you could easily make your $300 back plus some. Unethical, certainly, but possible.

"I'm pro AI revenge porn and think it should be legal to create AI revenge porn, to outlaw it is akin to fascism because I should be free to create AI revenge porn. This is democracy, damn it, where AI revenge porn is a pillar of our freedom!"
Maybe you meant to reply to someone else, but as a top level comment, this is what it sounds like you're saying.
Nah, the majority of people can decide to outlaw actions in a democratic state. Under consistent understandings of intellectual property, people should have the ability to prevent their likeness becoming a product unless it actual falls under fair use. Like most things AI, pre existing IP laws make most current uses of AI illegal. The only reason it's still getting pushed is thanks to the rule of law being secondary to the power of money.
The result is that anti deepfake laws aren't authoritarian unless you consider liberal democracy to be fundamentally authoritarian (which is fair, but only if you're consistent about it).