Hey Bigots!

Here’s hoping the new 18+ internet ID checks can organise us all against censorship

Narrator: It won't
- Morgan Freeman: New Narrator 'Not with that kind of attitude, you won't.'
- Depends on the political system of your country: 🇬🇧 🇺🇸 FPTP yeah you’re fucked.

Thanks. Just ordered one for myself. Fuck bigots.

Ordered from where? They didn't provide any links.
- I just searched and found one that looked good; there were a few different options.
  Here is the specific one I ordered: https://a.co/d/fgXpNMJ
  Enjoy!
- Seriously? Search the words... It's available from many different places, it's up to you to choose which of those is best to support with the money. Obviously don't go with Amazon or Ebay, and try to find some info about any of the other places to see if they actually support the message.
  I don't understand how this isn't obvious, how do you ever find stuff online?
- there is this technology called a search engine, I assume they used it to complete such a feat

I keep saying, incels need to be targeting country clubs instead of elementary schools.

Therein lies the issue: Causing others to suffer is the point, not the problem. They want to be part of that club.

Agreed, its the outlaw motorcycle clubs that are the real problem.

My buddy's roommate always strutted around in his leather what-have-you, snorting and mean mugging. Always trying to compensate for sadness with the routine. I got pissed off one day and said "off to your little dress-up club?" Dude melted. No problems and smart-face after that lol
It was just an unplanned moment but I really had had enough haha

I have been meaning to mention this. Has anyone noticed that many of those who are Trump sympathisers generally talk culture wars more, but less on class issues? My colleague said he agrees with what most of Trump says, but disagrees with the extreme measures. He is opinionated on gender debate, but hardly heard him talk about the tariffs (except when the stocks tanked back in April) or the welfare cuts and transfer of wealth to the elites with the big beautiful bill.

It is the same with my ex housemate. My former housemate supports Trump because of his non-interventionist foreign policy and tougher stance on immigration. Although tbf, he had been basing his support on Trump's previous term's fascist-lite policies, and probably didn't foresee the current POTUS going full Nazi. But even then, my ex-housemate hardly talks about economic issues.

Both traditional and new media intentionally polarises and divides people, with algorithms funneling only certain information to the electorates, while hiding other pertinent info. There is overemphasis on culture wars but minimises class issues, which is the root cause of social and economic decline.

Yeah, and the most wonderful thing here is that these people can agree that billionaires are sucking the juice of the society, the survival based on labor is archaic, and we're all being manipulated to become poor.
But somewhere in the middle, a logical excess is happening: the billionaires are not the only problem, it's the elite in general terms (intellectual included). Their main method is not only the market manipulation, but mainly a manipulation over CULTURE. And we need to somehow resist the later.
A lot of things get clear after you join Clubhouse - social network outrun by right and far right.
- To anyone who saw the post I am replying to, tread with caution. There's a reason that peer pressure is dangerous and it has nothing to do with the supposed "War on Drugs". The real villain of those old PSAs should have been fascism, not a random dealer, if there was any true benevolence behind it. If you must frame it in Conservative worldview, read "Fahrenheit 451" and remember Bibles burn just as easily as biology textbooks.
  "When they came for the drug addicts, I said nothing. Until they said Jesus was a hippie and took my whole church." Fascism is never good, for anyone. Even the perpetrators. Or do you honestly think no other Nazis wanted to bump off Hitler for personal gain? Fascism is, at it's core, a cancer. It kills societies as much as people, no one is truly safe.
  We didn't quite forget yet, but if we are too distracted in 2105 to remember 2025's echoed warnings from WWII and the Holocaust (1945), humanity will not survive to see 2185.
  tl;dr: Warning: May contain nuts or cults.

Well thats because 1% gets a disproportionate amount of representation in media so anyone whis just chronically online or watches a lot of tv thinks it is much higher

Prob balance out soon
And its prob much much higher than 1%, like 5-10% irl unless? Unless media has also influencer me

Isn't because the top biggots are from the 1%? Their goal is to distract people and steer their anger towards some other 1%.

I feel like this could be interpreted as the opposite meaning, siding with the bigots unfortunately.

If a misunderstanding like this forces a bigot to wear a trans pride flag on their shirt, I'm ok with it.
- Are you me? I was just gonna write this.
The devil doesn't need more advocates. Pretty sure most people would have a base understanding of this shirt.
- The devil doesn't need more advocates.
  i love this i'm taking it thank you
How?
- I think they mean a bigot might wear this shirt to say the 1% you're wrong for siding with is trans people.
  I don't think most people would think that though, so they would just end up looking supportive by accident.
I don't see how?
“Won’t anyone please think of the brick fucking stupid people?!?!?” - You. That’s what you sound like.

Fuck me that hits HARD! Perfect messaging. Any Democratic politicians listening? Anyone? Poo-tee-weet?

Guess the party is dead. So it goes.

I don't doubt that democrats have transpeople's best interests at hand. They of course deserve rights like the rest of us.
However, I believe that establishment politicians on both sides are using transpeople as a distraction from how the ruling class is exploiting us.
"So what if I don't support any policy that could reduce the disparity in wealth, at least I support trans people!"
There's no reason why we can't have both, and we should stop voting for politicians that are part of this two-pronged strategy.
- Democrats don’t do shit for our rights. It’s really that republicans that we are demonic pedophilic rapists or confused autistic girls tricked into lopping our breasts off, and the other side pretends that they support us while doing jack and shit to ensure that we get treated with basic human dignity.

Why discriminate? Tiny titties deserve being stared at too!

Fucking weird found.
- Everyone should be fucking weird. Isn't that kind of the point?
...........you uh......you maybe want to rethink that thought process?
Hopefully people in the future will read your comment as saying:
Deleted by creator
- Oh i know the thought process is off center for the comment, but I found it funny (for me anyway) and posted the result because, why not.
  Saw the picture, thought of "hey, my eyes are up here", then of the Simpsons "i made my choice" meme. The writing said "1%", but a lot of men have only one singular thought when staring at a woman's chest. So taking the whole "you're focused on the wrong 1%" as referring to breasts as a body part and only a small part of the individual, the meaning can become "stop staring at my tits and see me as a person". But then I thought, different sizes, different percentages. Looking at the picture again, assigning just 1% to it would probably mean a small size, tiny even, and i felt upset on their behalf in this short imaginary journey. Hence the comment.
  Now, was that the thought process you were imagining when you made your comment or something else entirely?

I'm lost: which is the right & wrong 1%?

I don't get why everyone else isn't lost: are you in the same cult?

Top 1% by wealth. Not the 1% of outliers by sexuality/gender identity
- Does anyone refer to
  outliers by sexuality/gender identity
  as the 1%?
  Seems a bit reaching to draw this connection naturally. Too much is implicit: I wonder how many people (outside the bubble here) won't scratch their head at this.
Are you for real?
- The guy for realn’t
- Are you not?