Men can't read our signals
Men can't read our signals
Men can't read our signals
If only. I can read THOSE signals.
I'm autistic as fuck so I can't read anyone's signals but men are just as bad. I could never understand why men worked so hard to get my attention and got all weird when I didn't give them that attention.
They also spend a lot of time trying to shape me into the type of man they want to be around yet they would never outright say what they are doing and why I should change for them.
Then they would get all jealous when I actually hung out with women and get even weirder about it when I wouldn't engage them in the weird conversations they wanted to have about women.
Like dude, if you want a hug or a cuddle, just say so because these roundabout games you're playing is confusing as fuck.
So now I wander the earth thoroughly confused...
A bit of insights:
They get all weird because they see getting your attention as a sort of investment. They take time, effort, dedicate themselves to figuring out how to best build contact with you, and when it doesn't work out, it naturally leads to frustration. From there, they either close down (minimize losses), or get weird (frantically trying to make it work).
As per hugs and cuddles, masculine culture heavily disincentivizes tender emotions, and they can be seen as a reason for ridicule. Being burnt heavily on that, many men prefer to be very careful about communicating such needs.
Part of the confusion is the men I have had experiences with spend a lot of time talking about women but then invest an uncomfortable amount of time trying to turn me into a man that they want me to be for them.
One guy spent nearly two weeks trying to get me to take creatine and go work out with him. Like if he wants me to cuddle him with big, strong, manly arms, he was going about it in a weird way.
It's just as confusing when men love that I treat them as unique individual but get upset with me that I also treat women like unique individuals, almost like they are jealous.
The signals are there but I can't read 'em!
How to be a neurotypical:
1 - Have a somewhat societally common and shared, but also very unique and specific to yourself/particular social group, way of understanding and projecting tone, microexpressions, vocabulary choices, speech cadence, etc, with many distinct or uncommon idiosyncrasies.
2 - Assume everyone else on the planet has essentially the exact same way of seeing and performing all this as you do.
3 - Confidently interperet social cues incorrectly considerably more often than Autists, but be blissfully unaware of this, pathologize and shame the idea of asking for clarity and communicating in a direct, precise, and less ambiguous way.
... Autistic people consciously learn, process and evaluate how social cues actually work, and Autistic people also very much like logically consistent things that are not contradictory... so they are more likely to either be very rigid with one way of understanding something, or to.ask questions to clarify things that are not actually clear, consistent, universal, precise.
It thus takes them longer to learn how to adaquetly perform all this, aka, Masking.
Neurotypicals on the other hand learn, process and evaluate and perform social cues much more unconsciously, and they are far more likely to just assume their interpretation is correct, that their projected behaviors convey exactly what they think they do... despite the fact that if you sit a bunch of them down, they will all describe significant differences between their ways of understanding and performing mannerisms.
Essentially, they're bullshitting it, but there are more bullshitters than non bullshitters, so bullshitting is the norm.
The thing about having to consciously learn social cues and how to talk to people is that if you do it right and get good at it you can be REALLY, really good at it.
I was just having some fun by pointing out that women aren't the only mythical creature whose signals are hard to read.
I do agree with your last point thoroughly, bullshitters do be bullshittin' it. A lot. Too much I would say.
But i can read those signals
yet another linux enthusiast learns she's trans 😔😔😔 linus can't keep getting away with it
SIGSEGV gets me in the most trouble with my wife.
I didn't remember but I thought I did, or I remembered incorrectly.
Off the joke topic, but something that made it make a lot more sense.
Scientists have studied this. Women do what are known as IOIs (Indicators of Interest). Most men can pick up on these. When they flirt, the rate doubles, or even more.
The problem lies in the base rate. It can vary a lot, from 5/hour to 120/hour. At this point men are left with a conundrum. Is a 60/minute lady a 10, desperately flirting, or a 100, who's slightly off put by you. The lady's friends have an instinctive read on this rate, so it's quite obvious. Most men have been burnt however, so tend to be over cautious. This can lead to a lot of flirting at oblivious men, who think you're just being polite.
Wait when did women get an abort and take a dump sigalert?
Linux users try not being an incel challenge: Difficulty impossible
It's all SIGUSR1's
Kill dash nine https://youtu.be/Fow7iUaKrq4
Is that what SIGILL means?? I thought it was an illegal cpu instruction?
"Just ask her out. Worst she can say is no."
Her:
kill -9
Me:
kill -9 $$
It's only a joke btw.
Damn, dude. Glad it's just a joke, but that's the nerdiest and most circumspect way I've ever seen this expressed.
I type
kill -4 $$
all the time so I don't pollute bash history. It's probably up there as most typed command in 3rd place afterl
andcd ..
.I swear I can type the entire thing in 1s flat on a good day.
I've seen 1 dollar sign, what does two mean in this context?
Oh dude. I, uh, overheard a very failed asking out they other day. It basically went:
Person 1:Hey, you're real pretty are you single?
Person 2:uhhhh no.
Person 3 pretending to be oblivious: Hey that looks real sharp
I've never seen anyone disappear quite so fast as person 1, so that was neat.
I'm confused by person 3.
I'm partial to
kill -KILL