Pokémon Rule
Pokémon Rule
Legally I have to say that we have the obligation to Pokémon Go to the Polls.
Is this Claude? What a square.
Copilot chose violence.
86Copilot is the most gamer-y of all the chatbots I've seen.
Which is wild as it's just a snapshot of GPT-4 behind the scenes.
My best guess is that there's a context bias by its association in the System prompt to Microsoft which brings it closer to topics like Xbox and gaming than models that don't have that alignment cue.
33Microsoft products have always been like this.
"How do I self-oof?"
Google: "Naw dawg don't do that get some help buddy :("
Bing: "Here are 18 different methods, 12 that are quiet and 6 that will leave scars in the minds of the local community for years to come."
36For reference, this is chatgpt
7
Claude: Destroy him.
6
it would be nice if there was an undertale kind of thing for pokemon, where you could either fight and capture them, like in classic pokemon style, or just not fight them, and somehow convince them to join your party or something. and i guess if there are trainer battles, you just shoot the trainers with a gun and liberate their pokemon from the yoke of their oppressors.
36Legends lets you just sneak up and throw a ball to attempt to avoid a fight.
13The pieces of shit at PETA made one
12I guess Pokemon Ranger is kinda similar
1Quick ball
1
Smart AI. Pokemon is bad.
12spoiler
"Winning" in this case meaning capturing the other Pokemon alive ... or even a significant chunk of them intact.
Honestly, the instant obliteration depicted is more humane than most poke-battles, but damn if I didn't find the AI's take amusing, after it took me an embarassingly long time to figure out what it was getting at.
8but think of palworld!!!!! palworld depicts violence and animal cruelty!!!!!!
obvious /s btw, god i hate pokemon fanboys
6The AI really just said "Stop being such a try-hard, its a game."
2