Amtrak Borealis launches, connecting Chicago and Twin Cities – NBC Chicago
Amtrak Borealis launches, connecting Chicago and Twin Cities – NBC Chicago
www.nbcchicago.com
Amtrak’s Borealis service connects Chicago, Twin Cities with daily service
19 comments
-
-
I got a roomette from Detroit to New Orleans recently and it was delightful. The cafe car was an atrium and I slept like a baby. It obviously cost more than a seat and took a long time but it was a pleasant experience. If I’d flown, I’d have probably just sat in a chair at home.
-
I am not going to hate on additional service but this feels like a vanity project.
We have delipidated infrastructure that is owned by some geriatrics clowns running it into the ground from their death beds.
Nationalize it and make it high speed. With out this, without these steps, this is just band aid to waste another generation worth of investments so these gereatric clowns' crotch fruit can collect another generation worth of taxpayers' money for doing nothing.
While we waste our lives traffic or 2 hour delays in the airport, cheers poor's!
Peperidge farm remembers east Palestine...
19 comments
Ok, but $40 for 7 hours? You can get a 1-hour flight for $129
We really need more high-speed rail
If that's a night train, fuck the flight. I'd rather sleep on the train and wake up in a new city for 40$ than drive to the airport for an hour, wait on the plain for 1-2 hours, wait 30 minutes for take off, and then get an uber or something to the city center for another 20$. With a train you show up, sit down, and arrive in the center of the city where I want to be.
I've slept on an Amtrak train before. It wasn't great, you're in a seat the whole way and a lot depends on who you're seated next to, unless you spring for a bed, which substantially increases the cost.
i can see it being ok for overnight, actually. like, i'm not against the idea, it's just that it services a narrower range of travel needs due to its long duration.
i'm from NYC, so i'm perfectly happy with train travel, but 7 hours is a long-ass trip.
I "slept" on auto train between fla and va. It was not good. The tracks are not straight and the train swings side to side a lot. Couldn't sleep too well at all. It took a long time to wait for all the procedural stuff like unloading the cars. Basically ate up two days instead of driving for one day.
That's a 1-hour flight, plus an hour to get to ORD, plus getting there the recommended 2 hours before the flight time to clear security and board, plus baggage claim at MSP. Flying is still faster, but the train is far more chill. High-speed rail would completely beat a plane.
But also, the train makes intermediate stops. I've seen a number of Chicago people on social media excited about taking the Borealis to Wisconsin Dells, and that travel time is pretty comparable.
You’re not wrong. Plus, the trip on the train is certainly quite scenic.
/c/fuckplanes
Don't mind the price but the time is long. It will be slightly faster than driving but most of that time is gained going from the Chicago burbs to the city center. Depends on where in Chicago you are going
i remember talk as far back as the 1980s about high-speed rail between the cities and chicago.
still waiting.
It's particularly embarrassing because the Chicago & Northwestern began Twin Cities to Chicago train service in 1935, called "The 400," because the railroad advertised "400 miles in 400 minutes." And they did it with steam.
You can drive to Chicago from the twin cities in 3 hours? What are you going 160mph the whole time with 0 traffic?
It is a 5 hour drive from Rochester a bit above the speed limit. Rochester is 45 minutes from the southern point of the twin cities.
Train is still longer, but not 4 hours longer. Still electric high speed trains would be the best, but that will never happen.
You've gotta be on the very edge of both suburbs to be doing it in that time. Minneapolis to Chicago is generally like 5 30