Quote: "LW admin/mod team seem to have this overbearing and weird belief that they need to tell everyone else what to think and how to think it. How about... you all just fuck off and don't?
Quote: [there were no comments removed in the modlog, but stormesp's recent comment history contains opinions critical of the LW News mod team, read them yourself]
Quotes: [multiple quotes, there are a lot, check out the link]
Result: 15 day ban
=====
Summary
Most interestingly here is that the two users who got permabanned didn't use slurs and didn't call for violence, they merely insulted the moderator team. I guess in the LW News mod team's eyes, that's a horrible, terrible, awful, unforgivable offense, so.......... PERMABAN.
Aniki literally is saying "words are useless, let's resort to violence" but that's a 15 day ban only, OK, makes sense, right????????
Catloaf and Stormesp were actively leaving comments sparring with the moderator team in that thread. To be honest, none of what I'm seeing in these comment seems worthy of a ban. Unless of course, you're a LW mod and you go "this guy is disagreeing with me, therefore they deserve a ban."
Edit: I forgot to write about MindTraveller since that guy douchecanoe was a last minute addition. But look at those aggressive comments, guy douchecanoe deserves a ban for sure.
Edit 2: fixed pronouns for MindTraveller
=====
Conclusion
Not a good look. Does LW want to grow into a good Reddit alternative or do they just want to turn it into Reddit for themselves only?
LW can at least come clean about this and say "yes, the rest of you can get fucked" or maybe they will have a moment of realization at some point "oh my god, are we the baddies?"
In my opinion it was a mistake for Lemmy to copy the same failed moderation model as Reddit.
In offline politics, we’ve learned from history that non-democratic governance always leads to the abuse of power. But somehow we imagined that in the online world this same dynamic would not play out. However, I don’t have a fully formed alternative in mind right now. It’s a thorny issue.
And I’m not trying to shit on LW admins here. I generally think they’re doing their best. But they’re only human, and it’s hard not to respond to people being shitty to you without being shitty to them. If you have an issue with what they’re doing, I would highly recommend you approach it in a polite way. Not just because it’s likely to have a better outcome. It’s also just the right thing to do.
However, I don’t have a fully formed alternative in mind right now.
The fediverse is already the alternative. The fediverse is democratic, you're just not thinking about it that way.
It's not democratic in the sense that you vote for your instance's admins and your communities' mods (though that is an option too). It is democratic in the sense that any user chooses their own instance and communities. So if you don't like your current instance, go to a different one. You vote by choosing your instance and your communities.
Of course if you would like an instance that democratically elects their admins and mods, you are free to go to such an instance (or start your own). But anyone who "loses" the election are also free to simply start their own instance and be an admin anyway, even though they lost. The users who voted for the losing candidate could then just go to that instance. And then we're kinda back to the same situation: you vote by choosing an instance and that's a good thing.
Notice which ones have the biggest shares? World, .ml, and Hexbear - three of possibly the shittest instances on Fedi at the moment.
Unfortunately until communities outside of LW become more lively, if most people are looking for drive-by discussion, they will find it at LW. For now.
In order to change that, we can all chip in to start livening up communities outside LW, like Blaze seems to be doing.
I would focus more on the second listing which has 57 for LW, 10 for lemmy.ml and 5 for SJW
Hexbear only has 1
I'm kind of impressed lemm.ee has even 3 top 100 communities due to the predominance of LW.
Also, I just had a look again. The 100th monthly community is starwars memes, and I count at least 2 sopuli communities above, !memes@sopuli.xyz and !ukraine@sopuli.xyz
we can all chip in to start livening up communities outside LW
Unfortunately until communities outside of LW become more lively, if most people are looking for drive-by discussion, they will find it at LW. For now.
Be the change you want to be. Building communities is hard work!
It means nothing, because these folks have complete control, but it fundamentally shouldn't be a ban for arguing with a mod or general shit talking. They've used the civility rules to essentially put moving target on what "disagreement" and "ban" looks like.
Telling a mod to fuck off should, at most, result in a deletion.
Lemmy mods jump to scorched earth
Edit tldr many more deletes, far less bans
Edit edit I'm not saying it's cool to just like, be a complete asshole, blow up a community, chase a mod around yelling garbage.
But it seems like mods here are far more trigger happy and "you don't see the world like I do, so banned" than any chat forum I've seen in the past.
Something I learned the very hard way, against my will, is when you have a user who is seriously against the mods, and doesn't really care about the sub, it's often best to just ban them.
Normally, the max I give is a week or two, long enough for most to move on, but some people just get obsessed. Others will literally ask to be banned. Those catch a perma.
Not saying the LW admins are right, but moderation is harder than it looks on the outside. Also ban evasion is basically a feature of Lemmy, it's so easy, and a lot do it.
It sucks, mods suck, being a mod sucks, everything sucks.
That's why I'm a proponent of a a truly federated system where for any community you would be able to choose which are the people in charge of moderating/curating your feed.
You need to be able to criticize moderators, and moderators need to be able to accept criticism, both good and bad. Some of those bans really speak towards really insecure moderation. I'm also not a fan of them being able to get complete anonymity while doing so. What usually happens is the problems is a bad apple within the mod team but the rest will still get defensive regardless when the only one you can blame is the entire group, it's group psychology 101.
Even "ACAB" cops all have an ID number that can identify them, and on lemmy it's even easier to create an alt. Heck, if you go over to their Matrix chat and talk to lemmy heads, they don't consider unfair abusive lemmy bans a big deal because "its ok if people are forced to create a new alt, if they aren't culpable they won't get banned again". Literally fucking shit logic, specially considering if a ban was actually justified you would not want to lose track of who that person is masquerading as.
The same reddit double standard is here, and I see that the modlog doesn't even seem to be displaying who the particular admin or mod who performed the action was anymore while still providing only the most minimal explanation with no chance for individual users to contest it. Seriously, all it took was for mods to create a mod alias, but even that was too much?
People left Reddit because of the API problem, but the problem was there long before. Subreddits like modsbeingdicks and others got banned even though their moderation did a top notch job at making sure personally identifiable information was removed from posts and comments in comparison to other subreddits that still remain. The future of Lemmy may very well be limited to becoming a poor man's Reddit. The Stanford prison experiment, read up on it, and if you find it too uncomfortable, jump on the bandwagon of trying to find something to nitpick about the study as it has become customary to do so, doesn't change how relatable it is.
It does seem heavy handed, but given how incredibly insufferable and annoying vegans on Lemmy have been recently, I can't say I blame the admins for deciding they've had enough.
Lemmy.world admins made it very clear they considered the statements being made as animal abuse, and that it wasn't welcome on their platform, and the community mods actually banned an admin in response, and reinstated a bunch of deleted comments.
I think the vegans will probably move communities, and it's probably the best option at this point.
If the LW admins feel justified in permabanning people for what they perceive as animal abuse, then surely the vegans are equally justified in being mean to people for what they also perceive as animal abuse. Your comment seems to indicate a double standard.
Also the LW admins decided to reinstate the c/vegan mods because they correctly identified that the admin who went rogue was overstepping.