Did you leave mastodon for bluesky? Why or why not?

Neither, I never used Twitter in the first place so I didn't need a Twitter alternative.
I think the Lemmy/Reddit style of posts and comments is much more intuitive and makes for easier engagement than the Twitter style of rolling status updates.

No. I don't trust another corporate-owned platform, and I don't trust the way they pay lip service to federation while still making everything dependent on one central server they control.

Bsky has actual people from twitter I wanted to follow that never bothered with mastodon

I'm sticking to Mastodon because I don't want to give into yet another corporate platform to eventually end up with the same results as Twitter and Reddit. Most people are on Twitter/Reddit/Bluesky? Who cares? Enough people are on Mastodon and Lemmy.

I gave Mastodon a couple of tries but I don't think I lasted more than a few days in either instance. I'm just really not into that style of social media, regardless of who the provider of the service is. I do not understand the point of it nor how to "correctly" interact with it.

I also found Mastodon to be extremely confusing and so has every person that I have directed to it. Mastodon's website and docs do a very poor job explaining how it works to people who are not already in-the-know about federated services. Lemmy was a bit confusing too but I had a much easier time grasping it - although that could be because I have more experience with Reddit-styled websites.

I wish it all the best because it seems like people are just making moves to other VC-owned, private, enshittified platforms that will abuse/exploit their users. I want Mastodon to succeed but often feel like it doesn't doing much to help its own case.

No.

Communication/Social Media isn't for corporations to do what they want with it, or to manipulate their users. It needs a neutral, open platform. That means open source servers and clients and protocols.

I find it worrying how so many people noticed the decline of Twitter happening live and now continue to move to the next corporate, closed-down platform. Until the next time, I guess...

Once in a blue moon I remember that I have a Mastodon account. And I use it mostly because of the cross-compatibility with other Fediverse applications, something that Bluesky lacks.

I suspect it has drawn people away from the fedi and back into the loving embrace of venture capitalists.

I think so, too. Even people who understand what federation is and why it's good are still affected by network effect; "it's federated" might weight a lot for them, but it is not a perfect shield.

No and I don't have any intentions to. It being a company means it has or it will have ads, and I have no interest in seeing more ads that I already have to.

Obviously, the answer is no, because nearly nobody from Bluesky is checking this.

I’m using Masto a few times a day and I generally like it. I get a good mix of news and pictures. I joined after Twitter became X.

I’m not on Bsky but frankly reading the comments in this thread makes me consider it

Why would a person not just use both? You don’t have to just pick one.

I refuse to support a corporate platform, whilst also adding nothing new to the agenda as well to make me want to go on Bluesky, so therefore I’m sticking with Mastodon/Fedi atm. Much more ethical that way.

Also much more fun and positive too with liked minded people on there too (except the Israel/Palestine stuff, which seems to be super divisive for some odd reasons in which it really shouldn’t be controversial at all but I digress tbh)

Also a way to say “fuck you” to Jack Dorsey too, who has ruined the internet, thanks to him tbh lol despite not being part of the Bluesky board anymore.

@Jezebelley
Why would I do that? I can't leave comments on Lemmy posts and Peertube videos from there!

I think people just are fed up with Twitter and are looking for the most twitter-like thing they can find. Mastodon is, frankly, nothing like Twitter. The vibes are too different.

I used to be a staunch mastodon fanboy, but honestly I'm starting to lean towards Bluesky nowadays.

Sure there's only one big company controlling all the instances, but their federation system has solved a lot of the pain points that have been plagueing Mastodon. I can actually follow artists on it without having to deal with mastodon.art.

And hey, it's an easy to use social media to use for the "normies" rather that the techie Mastodon.

I have a mastodon account, but using it feels like shouting into the void so I don't post much.

I have a Mastodon, but I don't use it that much.

I never even bothered to sign up for BlueSky. At least as of me writing this comment.

I'm on it, but only for the novelty currently. Sports haven't really taken off here yet, and I crave some interaction while watching. Instead of going back to Reddit, I'll shit post there and once it develops here or a better alternative comes up, I'll jump ship. Not a Twitter format fan.

@Jezebelley While it's disappointing that communities I'm interested in seem to have moved there - I have zero interest in using something that will inevitably become enshittified.

I use both. I'm a member of a local instance on Mastodon. On Bluesky, I follow more mainstream outlets.

I'm not on board with having one account to interact with the fediverse. I like the compartmentalization of using one account for some things and another for other things. I also see value in diversification in case something goes wrong or takes too long to be improved or repaired. However, I also see substantial value in all social networks communicating with each other so you can choose a platform that aligns more with your wants and needs while still getting the information that's relevant to you.

I just wish more "mainstream" outlets would get on board with the fediverse - either Mastodon or Bluesky. I really think towns and cities should invest in Mastodon instances where local government and other agencies could engage with the community (who may be members of other instances).

The "mainstream" outlets I follow on Bluesky are: Media Matters, The Conversation, Washington Post, BBC (unofficial), MacRumors, AP, Al Jazeera, Bloomberg, etc.

The local outlets I follow on Mastodon are mostly twitter bots via bird.makeup: the local police department, the mayor, the newspaper, sports reporters, etc. I wish more bars / restaurants, music venues, local blogs and reporters were on the fediverse (looking forward to cross-posting from Threads).

I'm actually using RSS a lot more than either Mastodon or Bluesky because so few outlets are accessible on the fediverse.

Nah, bluesky doesn't really appeal to me. I like the tumbr-ish culture on Mastodon.

Used Mastodon for two days. Not a great platform imo. Been using Bluesky for a few months and having a decent time, but sometimes it's hard getting fed the content I want (not sure if it exists in general there).

Also have been a decently heavy Twitter user since 2013 ish

Yes. I used both and I just didn't stick around in Masto.

Honestly, Masto is fine but the firehose is too fast for a system without good filtering tools. I ened up on a multicolumn layout where one of the columns was frequently NSFW and at least a couple of others were entirely dominated by insular "why is Mastodon so cool and everything else so crap" weird sunk cost propaganda.

And to be clear, I did keep a BS account to follow a bunch of celebrities from old Twitter, but I actually hang out more here than I do in BS. It's just I do both far more than Masto.

BlueSky already annoys me because someone took my name for an inactive account. It's why I chose Mastodon over BlueSky initially.

With that said, Mastodon has several glaring issues:

• Federation, in general, solves a problem that very few people have. People don't want to pick an app or an instance out of dozens. They want the prescribed experience, and then they want to tailor to their preferences.
• It's dead. There is interaction, but if you set up an account, follow some people, reply to some stuff, you'll probably get maybe 1-2 followers? The interaction seems stuck at a few people.
• There are a lot of bots, which in itself can be useful, but when several are there to maintain archives of Twitter accounts onto Mastodon it just adds to the deadness.
• It doesn't offer anything new or interesting over BlueSky or Twitter. It's just a clone.
• Humour hasn't really made it's way onto Mastodon. It's all very serious stuff, and many people like social media to look at dumb shit.

With that said, BlueSky is growing, but it's still a minnow.

No, I have plenty enough to read on Mastodon and don't need another way to get updates from news sites and blogs (which is all Mastodon is useful for to me).

No because why would I?

I'm following bsky's progress. They have shared things which on a technical standpoint and from a social network empowerment perspective are very interesting. The portability of the profiles and the fully custom moderation layers are particularly noteworthy and seem to go far beyond what I've seen in other social networks. Even in mastodon apparently it is not possible to port a profile from one instance to another without losing all your post history (ente.io tried this recently and got caught by this). And for moderation, you have to rely on your instance moderation rather than personalized one. And the annotation part of bsky is also interesting to me.

misskey still clears

I use all three: mastodon, bluesky, and twitter. Mostly because people I follow are on different platforms. Personally, I would settle for mastodon alone. There is a recent big wave of artists moving from twitter to bluesky because twitter got new policy that makes it impossible to opt-out from using images posted on twitter as AI training material. Actually those new rules to me sound like they're problematic in terms of author rights in general, not only AI stuff.

The only reason I haven't tried Bluesky is Jack's relationship to it, having suffered through the enshitification/nazification of Twitter BEFORE it's sale to fascist Elon Musk and subsequent purposeful destruction at the behest of the Saudis, I didn't want to be part of anything he was part of ever again.

The Fediverse, Mastodon/Lemmy et all is a sewer of antisemitism, which I was looking to sidestep with my move away from Reddit, but it's so much worse here with the neo anarchist/tankies all thinking their fighting the good fight, who seem to make up the majority of the Fedi instance owners and moderators.

This would also be the only reason I'd ever check out Bluesky, but I am inching ever closer as time goes on.

I made a Bluesky account and I'll generally try to post to it the same amount as my Mastodon account. But despite the so called "exodus" from Twitter, I don't find Bluesky to have any of the people I'm interested in following any more than Mastodon does. So it's a wash.

I'm keeping it around to see if more of my friends show up. But that's about all.

I like bluesky especially For You feed reminds me to X and there are lots of engagement. But, mastodon is okay for niche stuffs

Never heard of it

nah i left mastodon so i could have my own sharkey instance instead 😎

i do have a bluesky account but i don't feel compelled to post on there much tbh. it's fine, but i found it a lot harder to actually find interaction there even when i was making effort. also the feed system is balls (many feeds i use are frequently broken) and they only recently implemented hashtags, which almost nobody seems to use? there are definitely things i like about it too (the more casual vibe, for one) but at the end of the day it is another corporate platform, which i would prefer to spend minimal time on.