Putin repeats assertion that Russia did not start war in Ukraine
Putin repeats assertion that Russia did not start war in Ukraine
President Vladimir Putin on Thursday reiterated his position that Russia did not start the war in Ukraine but launched what it calls a "special military operation" to try to stop it.
President Vladimir Putin on Thursday reiterated his position that Russia did not start the war in Ukraine but launched what it calls a "special military operation" to try to stop it.
In his yearly speech to the Valdai Discussion Club, being held in Sochi, Putin said Russia, the world's largest country by area, had no need to take territory from Ukraine.
He said the conflict was not therefore imperial or territorial but about the global order, and that the West, which had lost its hegemonic power and always needed an enemy, had lost touch with reality.
Launching a "special military operation" is starting a war. You can call it a "pacifist peace offering operation", and it's still starting a war.
What Puta calls his starting of the war is irrelevant.
187Nobody expected him to say the truth, or am I mistaken?
30Sure, but now it’s in print (or at least digitally published), so later on there’s a mountain of journalism, this bit included, that says that he denies any wrongdoing. Every bit of getting his doublespeak out to the public helps
8
Peace is not war. As much as you should rightfully hate Putin for overstepping his boundaries and bullying Ukraine, he did not fucking start the war. Ukraine did. All the deaths, the destruction, everything? Ukraine's fault for not allowing a peaceful operation to happen that would have been eventually peacefully and justly resolved without the mass murder of innocents, including young children.
Sick of revisionist history, and the audacity of recent revisionist history. Putin is the bad guy here. Make no mistake. Do not think I am pro-Russia, pro-Putin here. But not a single bullet was fired, not a single person died before Ukraine decided to defend itself the only way a hateful, war-mongering, blood-thirsty country can.
-61World War 2 was started by France and Britain declaring war, Germany merely did a peaceful operation in Poland.
14
Test that theory. Leave Ukraine and see how much longer the war continues.
160Including Crimea
30Yep, out of Ukraine.
28
81“No no no…. That convoy wasn’t tanks, it was FARM EQUIPMENT!” -Putin.
“Well, it’s farm equipment….now”- Ukrainian Farmers72Permanently Deleted
64It's why everyone stopped making agreements with Russia. They have no obligation to hold to the agreements, their word is worth nothing.
13
Russian officials have literally said they're going to commit Ukrainian genocide and go after Poland next but sure they're the victim /s
43Wake up honey new hexbear talking points just dropped
38Run that through the good old projection filter real quick...
... Ah, shit.
37Cool story, blyat.
37You can put "Putin lies" in the title, Reuters. He isn't going to sue you.
35Reuters is literally owned by Russian gov.
-40https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_Reuters
You should update Wikipedia, they think it's owned by the Thompson family, a Canadian media conglomerate.
25
This "article" is three sentences with line breaks so they look like paragraphs.
This is what passes for journalism these days.
30I’m guessing that Reuters request for an interview was turned down. Sometimes all you need is three lines. If this was a CNN article or Fox News it would be 10 paragraphs of saying nothing but recapping Russia’s invasion of Ukraine while also adding this in. I find it to be a fine article to point out how Putin is interacting with his international cohorts. It’s to the point and says what needs to be said
7
I didn't rape you, I had sex with you to prevent you from whoring yourself!!!!
29"I'm killing them for their own good !"
11"We're giving them rest and peace by putting them in graves!"
3
Can we collectively start down voting all the headlines that boil down to "world leader makes meaningless propaganda statement"
The admins would remove it as an opinion piece if a reporter made such a claim but it's somehow different if they hold office?
28If a reporter had millions of soldiers, thousands of nuclear weapons, a submarine fleet, the world's largest standing tank deployment.. at their beck and call, to enforce their every whim, then yes the mad reporters ravings would be newsworthy.
30
Hexbear strategy. Patently false, as is standard.
27Pathetic little bitch.
23"If I keep repeating the lie, then eventually someone will believe me" - Putin
22Plenty of Christians do.
7The more often a stupidity is repeated, the more it gets the appearance of wisdom
More Voltaire wisdom.
3He might have convinced himself already. That doesn't change the facts though.
1
I don’t get it why people still even gives a damn to what he has to say. He’s a war criminal and he DID start a war, no matter how much him and his bots blame NATO.
He deserves to be arrested together with his supporters.
20so we did pushed your tanks over the border? Did you take your medicine today Vlad? Does telling a lie again and again really works that well in Russia?
16Worlds biggest bull shitter spews more shit, news at 11 lol. Don't need more territory then I guess can give Crimea back.
14Of course not. They started a special military operation. Ukraine started the war when they fought back!
13assertion
That's a really strange way to spell "blatant lie".
13Gaslighting
13I don't think this lie is anywhere sophisticated enough to "rise" to the level of gaslighting.
Only a complete total moron (or somebody living in an environment of total information control) would believe this and start to question his or her reality.
3
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Oct 5 (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin on Thursday reiterated his position that Russia did not start the war in Ukraine but launched what it calls a "special military operation" to try to stop it.
In his yearly speech to the Valdai Discussion Club, being held in Sochi, Putin said Russia, the world's largest country by area, had no need to take territory from Ukraine.
He said the conflict was not therefore imperial or territorial but about the global order, and that the West, which had lost its hegemonic power and always needed an enemy, had lost touch with reality.
The original article contains 100 words, the summary contains 100 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
12Despicable piece of human excrement.
10I’m usually all for inclusion in most chases, but I really think that the mentally handicap have no business in politics. Between this guy and trump… they need to be in padded rooms and medicated.
9Picture the generic Russian nesting doll, except inside each layer of the head of state is his own most useful idiot
8Yeah, everyone knows it was just a reverse psychology. /s
8Up is down, grass is blue, the sky is green. Bla bla bla. It's high time we just started treating anything Putin says as the equivalent of farts in a paper bag.
8If someone gives my farts in a paper bag I just kick them in nuts. When this guy speaks, I just want to see him ended.
0
He also insists he is 7 feet tall, has a 7 inch dong, and isn’t gay.
7He said the conflict was not therefore imperial or territorial but about the global order, and that the West, which had lost its hegemonic power and always needed an enemy, had lost touch with reality.
I'm a little confused, how does one separate actions towards global order from imperial actions? Aren't imperial actions typically in relation to attempting to establish or maintain a nation's position in, or as, the global order? In a similar vein, does anyone believe the West is a genuine, political entity that is altogether united, rather than a basic academic concept to help differentiate some elements of the world from others?
Last I looked around, the West is about as much of a real political entity that's wholly united about as much as the East is, which is to say, it isn't.
4Oh shut yer fuckin borscht hole already, сука блять
4A serial liar would say that.
1plot twist, Putin have suffered from dyslexia all his life and made "some" questionable decisions in good faith.
1
