They have played us for absolute fools

Isn't this meme format supposed to be satirical? Everything in this one is unironically true.

The right most image there is certainly not real
- Aww, you're right. The traffic engineer part of me is actually kinda disappointed.
  Still, it's definitely plausible for a stack interchange with extra ramps for, say, HOV lanes or C/D roads to be that complicated.

Here's the thing: I live in a mid sized city in Brazil. As in America, Brazil is very car centric (thanks, Kubitschek). But there's no trains. The capital city of my state has a single urban train line, and I think it's the only in the whole state, that's as big as France.

Your options here are:

use a car and endure the traffic;
get a poor planned, crowded and falling apart bus, and endure the traffic, because they rarely have exclusive lanes;
get a motorcycle, so you can split lanes and get through the traffic, but risking your life and not being able to carry more than one (adult) person and a handful of small items;
or use a bicycle in this very hilly and mountainous place, with close to no infrastructure to make it less risky.

I chose to use a motorcycle (although I couldn't afford one yet because we're poor), but I understand that for anyone with a family, owning a car is not a choice, it's a necessity (and it's a very expensive one)

Time to make it a political movement then. Because the people who have any sort of power to make significant changes are politicians.
- First we have to convince people here that this is a problem at all. Most people think that the solution to the traffic problem is more roads, more lanes, cheaper cars, and better buses.
  The buses are bad? Just make them better. There are too many cars in the streets? Just make better streets
  Buses are that bad usually because they are a monopoly or very close to it. The government chooses which company can do public transportation by rigged licitations, and no other company can do it. Then they have no reason at all to do a good job.
  Most people seem to have given up on the idea of more train lines. No company can do it, only the government. Every politician promised it, but adding train lines to an existing city is very hard, so none do

I hope to some day live somewhere that allows me to take a train to where I want to go mid to long distance and the ability to walk short distance to the rest.

Even while having a car, I found my self taking transit anyways. To the point where both my daughters (15 and 17) have absolutely no desire to get a car or their drivers because not only do they see what's happening to the climate, but know transit well enough that vehicles are next to pointless for them. My understanding is that many, not all, of their friends thing the same way, too.

That, and I don't care if you drive a BMW. My ride costs 150k, and comes with a driver who opens the door for me. Fuck cars and the status that goes with 'em, too.

What you call transit is a bus?
- The general term for public transportation. Bus and train lines alike locally are referred to as transit.
  "Gotta hit transit and I'll be there"
Also, it's ironic that cars are supposed to be a status symbol because "public transit is for poor people" but cars are practically mandated and cities where public transit exists are expensive to live in thanks to high rents.
Actually, it's public transit that should be the sign of wealth and cars that are "for poor people" but something tells me that by some strange alchemy, that means a car is a sign that one is a salt-of-the-earth working class type now.
Interesting fact, it costs tens of thousands of dollars to get a permit to own a car in Singapore.

I get this is absurd on purpose, but I don't think having a decent amount of groceries on hand is crazy. I don't drive and I aim to not have to go to the store every other day. 2 weeks seems about right for grocery store frequency.

Cargo bike
- I can easily get two weeks of groceries in my bike.
- Not really sure if this is for or against my comment (or just neither), but to clarify, I'm saying I do load up on 1-2 weeks of groceries without a car and I don't think it's unreasonable with or without a car.
When grocery stores are close (walkable) it becomes super convenient to just go there every few days instead of managing a stockpile of food. Works way better for small spaces and for eating fresh foods. Don't knock it til you try it!
- I'm not saying that's unreasonable either, tbf. I don't live in walking distance to a grocery store, though, and neither do most people I suspect, so bigger shopping trips just make sense. It would definitely be nicer to have a store nearby, though!
I aim to not have to go to the store every other day
When cities are designed right, going to the store every day (let alone every other day) isn't a problem.
From my perspective it's sorta crazy. How does one even have the space for several weeks of perishable groceries, or move them effectively from the store home. It all seems like so much wasted space.
Also how does one plan buying all you potential cravings for two weeks. I sorta don't get it, emotionally I don't.
I encourage you to try living a <10min walk from a grocery store if you ever get the chance. Right now I'm at< 3min to walking to the grocery store. It's the best. Especially if it's open till midnight or god forbid 24/7.

I should start handing these flyers out at gas stations on Sunday on the I15 from Vegas back to California. People feeling like shit hung over cursing traffic for hours on end, the usefulness of a train alternative is super apparent in this situation.

Are there any non-extremist anti-car communities around? I hate cars too, but I also hate simple, blanket solutions like the world is easy or something.

For some people, not driving is just death from starvation. So, no. Thanks though.

I don't see anything extremist in this community. It's mostly complaining about problems with cars and a few memes like this post. Talking about alternatives is fine here, as per the rules. There isn't much as far as other communities to discuss alternatives, at least not that I've found. Here's what I can point to:
!transit@kbin.social
!urbanism@slrpnk.net
!citylife@beehaw.org
- Ooh, thank you. I was just complaining about an annoying meme on the internet in a comments section, don't mind me.
  Unfortunately I think we're defederated from beehaw still, lol, but the transit one is new for me. Appreciated.
The ironic thing is that there really is a "simple, blanket solution" in this case: changing the zoning code to stop outlawing density.
It's not a fast solution -- the law can be changed at the stroke of a pen, but the redevelopment enabled by the rule change will occur over years and years -- but it's the only one that actually solves the problem.
- Blanket, yes. Simple, no. Not unless you think politics is simple.
For some people, not driving is just death from starvation
That seems like the exact kind of thing many people are against. All of this was by design in order to create a dependence on cars. This is not how it has to be. There are a lot of alternatives that are worth investing in.
I don't believe anyone would suggest to immediate destroy all cars right this second without putting in any kind of necessarily alternative infrastructure. That would be a pretty extreme stance on the matter.
I would like to see the US government stop subsidizing cars and start subsidizing alternatives such as trains so that maybe in 30-50 years we can start to see that it is possible to live without driving a car.
People are so bad a naming causes.
This toxic ass community is the same as BLM and anti work. Both have good intentions but alienate most people with their terrible names.
At least anti work had a better named workreform equivalent. But BLM shoulda be accountability for killer cops or something. I bad at naming shit too but hopefully you get my point.
Fuck cars is about infrastructure and mostly just cities. But it's so terriblely named it will never catch on.
- Fuck cars is mostly a meme community spreading ideas from the larger urbanist movement, which has the benefit of having a less hostile-sounding name.
  The meme community inarguably manages to recruit new people into the urbanist movement, and I haven't seen strong evidence that it's alienating more people than it is recruiting, fwiw.

"They" are us. As we change things, they get changed:-). Slowly but surely... it's happening!

I agree with the message but it feels weird considering this flavour of memes was meant to be a hyperbole / sarcasm / laugh at your own expense.

Train gonna take me to the middle of nowhere for disc golf and hunting?

I get that you are being snarky, but in Japan, they have trains that take you to the middle of nowhere. So, yes, a train can. At least, to your last mile car option.
- Having a train go to all these places is unrealistic is it not?
  https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5afa4aa7-ed3e-420e-b042-2db1dccd26c1.jpeg
  Or mtns https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/32eb0ae3-e364-4763-bdd0-0d01e5ad47af.jpeg
  Cars are awesome.
Living in the city, I can bike to a disc golf course. ¯(ツ)_/¯
- Living in the city
  Lol lemme stop you right there bud

Utter bullshit. It's not about driving from a to be.

Have you ever brought your old and ill grandparent to a doctors appointment 20kms away when he can't hold it anymore - via train/bus? Have you ever took your grandma to the grocery shop via train/bus? Have you ever get home as fast as possible because of a accident at home? Have you ever done anything outside of a big city?!

People who advocate for better public transportation usually also advocate for walkable neighborhoods. Your grandparents would not need a car to go to grocery, it'll be at a walking distance. Same for doctors.
As for emergencies, yes, a car would be nice. But you can always get a can in that situation. No need to destroy the planet every other day.
Let me ask you this, have you ever done anything outside of a car only dystopia?
- So you proved my point. Try it in a village or very small town.
@Miclux @cypherpunks have you ever done anything inside of a big city? have you ever commuted to work?
- Have you ever done this between small villages? 30km apart? Have fun.
Even cities below a population of 100k have their own hospital and dozens of doctor's offices all within a ten minute walking distance from each other.
- You don't even ever lived in a city with less than 10k population. No doc, no hospital. No train. Just bullshit talks from privileged people.
anything outside of a big city?!
The photos OP is sharing are depicting 10 or more lanes. That's precisely about a big city. Meanwhile the situation you describe, e.g doctor 20km away, no train/bus access, seems to be about not a big city. I believe you two are not talking about the same problem even though both are valid.
In places designed before/not for cars you'd have places within walking distance like groceries. In the doctor scenario, we've had adult diapers for a long time. Your solution is you let them pee in your car?
- In the doctor scenario, we've had adult diapers for a long time. Your solution is you let them pee in your car?
  And your solution is they shit themselves on public transportation?
  I mean, I'm 100% for better public transportation and urban centers designed around walking, but let's compare apples to apples here.
  They didn't make a straw man argument, they had a point. It's a genuine issue and they deserve better than a flippant remark telling them to make grandpa wear diapers so he can piss himself on his walk from the bus stop.
I have done most of those things, ~95% of everything I have ever done was in small rural towns/villages. I don’t have a car, refuse riding as a passenger, and no license either and don’t feel the need to get one at all. Admittedly I live in a 15k people city right now but that is just way too much so I’ll go back to something smaller as soon as I can. And I don’t live in the US so I got that going for me, which is nice.
this is a weird instance, to be sure. I thought it was satire, but there's a lot of people who seem to lack the ability to think critically about transportation in general.
your comment isn't even irrational at all. but you're being downvoted because you don't ascribe to the theory that the world should be all butterflies and rainbows and everyone can just walk everywhere or take public transport.
public transportation can be great. but it can be so bad it's basically unusable.
all stuff I read in here sounds like a bunch of kids preparing for debate team about whether cars are "good" or "evil"