What kind of land do 100 largest landowning families have that it’s not covered under other categories? (Other than timberland in the top left?)
35ReplyPrivate mansions, estates, forests I would imagine
19ReplyUnderwater land
9Reply
I can't wait for lab grown meat.
26ReplyI'm excited for the possibility of being an ethical cannibal. Imagine being able to take a tissue sample and then grow a steak that's made of you.
16ReplyBelle Delphine was a pioneer with her bath water. Can she do it again?
13Replyno
7ReplyFinally we can join Grace in enjoying a MeBurger
5ReplyGives new meaning to the word mastication
1Reply
You can stop eating meat at any point. No need to wait for lab grown.
13ReplyFalse assumption. He said he wants lab meat. Hard stop. It is implied by the hard stop that he's ok with current things OR doesn't eat much/any current meat, but after that unknown, looks forward to lab meat.
10ReplyThat's like saying "you can just not go to war"
Yea great you solved war forever.
People aren't going to stop eating meat, it's not a reasonable solution. Lab grown meat is a potential solution
3ReplySocial conditioning is a hell of a drug. I eat a fraction of the meat I used to but it's still hard to completely stop.
Imo we don't need a lot of people to become full vegetarians, we need everybody to eat less meat.
2Reply
I’m shocked at how small desert is
13ReplyMaybe because half of Arizona got turned into fucking cow "pastures" and alfalfa farms for some stupid reason.
11ReplyFor foreign governments to buy. That way they don't have to use their own water to grow it. Not even joking give it a Google.
4Reply
no way urban is that big compared to rural
does urban here include suburbia??
13ReplyWhere else would suburbia belong? The images I've seen from the US looks very much like urban environment
11ReplyYes it does frequently include the suburbs. Also there are LOTS of small cities that are urban - its not just NYC and Los Angelos. Its... Irvine, CA. Its... Portland, Oregon.
5Reply
Cool graphic! Data sources?
12ReplyPoor people of Cleveland. The ground being covered in maple syrup sure is a sticky situation.
12ReplyIt's a little bit too far east for Cleveland, more like Ashtabula. But we do actually have a lot of maple trees
1Reply
No section for parking lots? That would probably take up about 25% of the map
11ReplyMost likely part of 'urban commercial' and the housing sections
11Reply
daily reminder that most of the land that is used to grow livestock feed is land that is not fertile enough to grow things like wheat but can still grow things like grass
9ReplyYes, you are right, for pastures. The category Lifestock feed is soybean, corn, wheat, barley and triticale, all that goes into the stomachs of monogastric animals (pigs, poultry, ... humans).
3ReplyExcept its use as pasture has wrecked the ecosystem that would be there otherwise. From forcing certain plant life to driving out predators, "would still be grass" isn't really saying much when the damage is severe nonetheless.
3Reply
Wyerhauser?
9ReplyForestry company: https://www.weyerhaeuser.com/
4Reply
Fuck it, united single-use zones of America
9ReplyVermont as urban? Vermont? The state with the least amount of people in it?
7ReplyThe locations are arbitrary, it's just visualizing total land usage. In reality everything would be intermixed
24ReplyNope, it's official, we're all moving to Vermont now. Your current home will be demolished in 72 hours or less.
14ReplyOP do you know where this is from its cool?
1Reply
I think you'll find that Wyoming is the state with the fewest people.
You're right on your main point, though, it's not exactly Manhattan 😄
3Reply
What is this supposed to be?
6ReplyIt's a map of what percent of us land each thing takes up
17ReplyI assume this is overall percentage across the US, and it’s not implying that certain regions are mapped to certain industries.
11Reply
A more square America.
3ReplyWe don't do angles here
1Reply
the blue part at the top should actually read "federal, national, and state parks made up of stolen tribal lands".
5ReplyI think that's true of the entire country, except maybe the desert between Phoenix and Vegas.
6ReplyShould’ve defended it better😎
2Reply
Mining in the US is too tiny to note?
3ReplyI guess it mostly uses land vertically not horizontally
6Reply
Rip South Carolina and their Rhode Island sized golf course.
3ReplyCemeteries don't deserve a call-out?
2Reply"Rural housing"
11Replythat's where your rent control is
1Reply
This infographic gave me Downs Syndrome.
1ReplyYou wouldn't make the same comment but referring to skin colour instead of trisomy. So please don't use trisomy 21 in such a context
4Reply
Cotton
1ReplyMost of Montana, 62% officially, is fields so that seems really inaccurate
1ReplyThe position on the diagram is arbitrary, it just shows the proportion of land use type
9ReplyThat makes much more sense, I wonder why they decided to post it without context. I just assumed it was some kind of "how the USA looks to a [...]" meme.
5ReplyAh that makes a lot of sense. I was wondering how the Adirondacks in NY and northern Vermont are "Urban Commercial housing" and north eastern tip of Ohio is maple syrup.
2Reply
Damn, Michigan is lazy asf
1Reply