DOJ denies existence of transgender people in stunning court filing defending Trump’s military ban
BREAKING: DOJ denies existence of transgender people in stunning court filing defending Trump’s military ban
BREAKING: epstein files still not released.
Well I guess that's it then, that solves the trans issue a very pressing issue which needs absolute fixing unlike let's say the skyrocketing housing prices or the ever rising prices of groceries... yeah priority is people who are literally fewer than 1% of the global population and that if left the fuck alone normally statistically speaking cause no fucking issues.
Well now I can sleep better
skyrocketing housing prices
Oh no, it's worse than that:
Well I mean, if you charge like 290k for a 90 sq meter 3 bedroom apartment then maybe... just maybe people don't have that kind of money if they're struggling as things are.
What I mean is the French had a wonderful solution for this like 200 and something years ago with this amazing tool that gave you a nice haircut
Yeah but that was 3 months ago. And prices are still going up so something's clearly fucky still. Needs a sharp jab to correct
next will be the rest the LGBTQ+ then it will be POCs.
General purpose white people are going to be so mad when they aren't considered white supremacist enough to exist.
trump will like purge LOYALISTs that are not "loyal" enough to him.
Honestly, they should expedite this. Go ahead and make the US military all white men. See how well that works.
Just like birds, I am told. I mean, these DOJ fuckwads identify as human, and I deny their existence, which makes it true.
that first guy is so hot
...the Native Americans had 9 genders, we are just continuing our white steamrolling over their land and beliefs...
It’s important to talk about tribes and not just generalize to “Native Americans.” It’s like talking about “European” culture and implying that the French have the same culture as the Italians. Plains Indian culture ≠ Pueblo culture ≠ Salish culture ≠ Alaskan indigenous culture ≠ etc. Any generalization that flattens these groups to “Native American” is dicey at best.
The Zuni have lhamana, like We’wha. The Choctaw and Chickasaw have hatukiklanna/hatukholba (pronounced/spelled slightly differently but closely related). The Cherokee have asegi. I’m just listing off the ones I know off the top of my head; research the tribes local to your neck of the woods and learn about what they have.
Like I’m really mystified as to where your 9 is coming from. Also “had” - native Americans are still here ya know.
With regards to culture, those generalizatios don't work at all. If you're talking about how white people treated them as one big group, then that makes more sense, but treatment did still vary a bit.
That's a nice comment, good information.
But like, the reason he generalises is probably because of the massive destruction of indigenous American culture that was perpetuated by European colonialism.
Thus we are very ignorant of all of the cultures. Which saddens me greatly. (I love shows and movies which use the native languages and portray the cultures when they're actually done well. I wonder how right they got the Kanien'kéha language that they're supposedly speaking as Mohawks, you can hear some in This clip - weirdly to me it sounds sort of like garbled and nasal Estonian being spoken for some reason)
You make a perfectly reasonable comparison that people rarely generalise to such a degree when it comes to Europe. But had like 95% of the culture and people's been erased and forcefully surpressed, then I think people would generalise to an extent. Not that it makes it okay in any way, just saying that ignorance is the cause of such generalisations usually.
Which is why comments like yours are so great, bringing the info that we haven't found (or even looked for.)
So keep up the good work! Thanks
This administration also probably doesn't recognize them, nor their rights either.
So, they recognize that how people identify is important? They just choose not to recognize what they identify as. That seems like it would open the door legally to force recognition of identity. IANAL.
I guess some of my friends are imaginary.
you can't ban what doesn't exist. How can they ban those people if they don't exists? If would be some interesting waffling on their part if they got sued along those lines of thought.
I don't think so either but unfortunately Trump and his fellow narcissists are still there.
Not sure what it has to do with trans people though.
"According to court documents, transgender military members diagnosed with gender dysphoria were more deployable than their cisgender counterparts who were diagnosed with depression."
This is queer erasure. And you know it. Because you're here to spread hate and toxicity. Not to participate in good faith.
joined lemmy literally an hour ago, already making the rounds spewing fascist garbage.
How much (whatever government body/agenda you work for) they paying you? working on a sunday morning? that's rough comrade. sooooo safe to assume somewhere in Russia eh?
So ... Trump?
No. Trump and everyone he appointed except for Jerome Powell fit that description.
What getting "gay bamboozled" in the early 2010's on 4chan does to a motherfucker...
If transgender people don't exist, then exactly whom are they trying to kick out?
Transgender people.
Don't think too much about it, it's meant to be nonsensical.
men who don't look like Hulk Hogan in Suburban Commando.
This is why you don't have inexperienced drunkards advising the president on military matters.
hot dog skin, with hair of Doll.