Have men really stopped reading? We take a deeper dive into the data
Have men really stopped reading? We take a deeper dive into the data

Have men really stopped reading? We take a deeper dive into the data

Have men really stopped reading? We take a deeper dive into the data
Have men really stopped reading? We take a deeper dive into the data
Tl:dr?
Was going to read this article, then realised I'm a man.
@maniacalmanicmania TL;DR
;)
since His Lordship's ADHD diagnosis he's stopped fighting himself and now chiefly audiobooks. His "reading" intake has upped significantly.
@maniacalmanicmania I can say that my OH has increased his amount of reading in the past two years.
I am very impressed that a hydroxyl group can read at all, let alone increase their amount of reading!
@Kernal64 Yeah, well, he is impressive, free, radical, but pro-active.😉😁
I read 23 books so far this year. I'm doing my part.
What have you read if you don't mind telling us.
The main thing is the little black lines – the “confidence interval” – a statistical measure of uncertainty that can be used when showing the average value of data from a survey (or other type of research).
And what this means, which I have confirmed with the ABS, is that the reading rates are statistically the same for males and females within all generations with the exception of gen X.
Is this correct? I haven't studied statistics since high school so I am completely clueless, but it doesn't make sense based on my rudimentary understanding of what a confidence interval is supposed to do. The confidence intervals overlap, but they are not identical. Doesn't that mean that reading rates could be statistically the same, but not that they are statistically the same?
Anyway, I also found it interesting that men read more magazines than women now too, considering it was historically the other way around and that many men actually believed its existence as a societal norm was an example of their superior rational minds.
Yes, it means could be the same, not are the same. It does mean they are confident (95% confident, I assume, I'm not clicking through to the study) that the rates are different for men and women in Gen X
It does mean they are confident that the rates are different for men and women in Gen X
Umm, surely not? If the confidence intervals overlap it means that they are not confident that the rates are different, doesn't it? Of course, it also does not mean that they can say they are confident that the reading rates are the same.
So the statistically sound way of saying it is that the null hypothesis is that reading rates are the same, and their study has failed to reject the null hypothesis.
If you want to be precise, overlapping intervals mean that we lack evidence to assert that the means are statistically different for our chosen confidence level. This is often simplified to the statement that they are statistically the same.
We need to bring back playboy!
@MantisToboggon "I only buy it for the articles!"😉 @maniacalmanicmania
I stopped going to the library to read physical books because I am too lazy to travel. I do read magazines and reseach papers off libgen tho
I read way more ebooks than paper books. The convenience, portability, low light control, and text size manipulation are big wins with ebooks over paper. There's also simply tons of ebooks available from public libraries.
I'm reading right now. Ohh, you mean books? I plead the fifth.
The fifth what?
THE FIFTH!!!