Maths
Maths
Maths
x/100 * y = x * 1/100 * y = x * y/100
I never would have thought of it myself and still feel like I should have thought of it myself.
So 37 % of 38 is equivalent to (37 * 38 ) / 100 ? Which I can almost do in my head.
37 * 4 is 148 I think, so 37 * 40 is 1480. Subtract 74 we have 1406. So we have 14.06?
You're hired
For a while I’ve been meaning to memorize all the two digit squares but of course I then fail to practice them, so I’m not very far along. But that would help you with this too, not to mention you can start doing some square roots too.
For quick and dirty I’d probably just go with 37*38 = 40*40 -> 16%
which is kinda close to 14% eh?
My dyscalculic ass trying to remember what 50% of 6 is
Probably 5 tbh
is tree fiddy
6/100 * 50 = 50/100 * 6
6 * 1/100 * 50 = 50 * 1/100 * 6
it all equals 3
650/100 = 506/100 if anyone is curious why this works.
Or, more generally:
Taking X percent of something is the same as multiplying by X/100.
X percent of Y = Y(X/100)=(YX)/100
Y percent of X = X(Y/100)=(XY)/100
(YX)/100=(XY)/100
Percentages are indeed reversible.
Legitimately new knowledge for me that will literally make my work easier. Wish I could give you more than 100% of 1 upvote, OP!
I wish someone told me this trick 30 years ago.
1 of 100% upvote. Yeah, it checks out!
I'm gonna track down all my HS math teachers and punch each and every one of them in the mouth.
Most of the people explaining this still make it more complicated than it needs to be, imo.
I just think the symbol "%" algebraically means 0.01
This is the coolest trick since I learned about the "quick 20% tip on your tab" method. Take the total bill, move the decimal point one place over to the left, then multiply it by 2 to get 20% gratuity. I will sometimes round down on the change to make it closer to 18%. Also I only really need to do this when I'm drunk and can't maths.
Why would you multiply by 2? 10% is a good tip.
As long as wages are supplemented by customers, the restaurant industry will never pay their employees a fair wage.
10% is in fact, not a good tip, despite your misplaced morals. You think by stiffing servers that restaurants will care? Do you honestly think that will make a difference, or are you just cheap? Build the cost of a tip into what you expect to pay for a meal out or don't eat out. Tip culture sucks but it's the standard and you don't have to like the standard but fix it at the ballot box, not at the dinner table.
As a former service worker,
I don't like tip culture either, but I'm not going to stiff the guy making federal minimum wage.
If I'm drunk and having a good time, 20% seems fair to me. You can pay whatever you think is fair, I'm not passing judgement on that account.
10%s a shit tip, work a year in service and say that
And we should definitely short shrift the folks working for tips in the meantime.
commutable...
Can we say "commutative" in this case ?
Yeah stuff like that really ain't it. It works in a few use cases, but is objectively wrong and detracts from understanding the topic properly. That's why I teach percentages as the fractions they are. By the time you learn percentages, you already know multiplying fractions is commutative, so the trick still works, and you also understand why.
That's because multiplication is commutative
taking a percentage of something essentially means multiplying it with a hundreath of the percentage
6% of 50 essentially means 50 * 0.06
or
50 * 6 * 0.01
and since
50 * 6 * 0.01 = 6 * 50 * 0.01
then of course
50 * 0.06 = 6 * 0.5
And we have the above
Yeah my brain just sees 5*6, and then I move the decimal. I never understood how people couldn't figure out tips when they wanted 20%.
If you live in the U.S. you do them quite often, multiply by 2. Want 10 multiply by .1... Half that and add it if you want 15. Whatever is easiest at that moment
... in 1 or 2 dimensional number systems, also known as the real (1-dimension) and the complex (2-dimensions) numbers. With quaternions and higher dimensional systems multiplication is not communicative. In fact, the more dimensions you add, another mathematical property is lost.
... okay? Yes? Nobody thought otherwise? Do we now have to clarify every statement about algebra by specifying that we're talking about an algebra over the reals or the complex numbers? Or the polynomials or the p-adic integers, whose multiplications are also commutative?
No one would call these "n-dimensional" number systems either. The algebra for each of these operates in R1 and R2, respectively, but, like, you would describe their algebras as being over an n-dimensional vector space. It's not wrong, but I don't think "two-dimensional number system" is something you'd hear mathematicians say.
This pedantic aside feels so "I just watched a 3blue1brown video and feel verysmart(TM)" that I don't know what to do with it. It's good to be interested in math, but this ain't it. Everyone knew what they meant.
Yes, 47% of 47 is certainly much easier to determine when you look at it as 47% of 47! Genius!
You can also
Multiply one side, divide the other to get the base number to get the base number to 100.
6% of 50 == 3% of 100 == 3
5% of 20 == 1% of 100 == 1
7% of 50 == 3.5℅ of 100 == 3.5
14% of 200 == 7% of 100 == 7
Edit* as pointed out below, this one was incorrect.
14% of 200 == 28% of 100 == 28
You don't have to stop at percentage either.
25 * 16 = 100 * 4
If you're doing addition, you can add and subtract.
27 + 13 = 20 + 20
Most of the difficulty is in realizing that one number or the other can be brought up to a nice round number, making the equation simple to do in your head. And obviously, just getting to around number on one side doesn't always make it easy on the other side.
I always loved screwing with math problems to make them easier, which is weird, because overall, I don't really care for math.
I also do shit like borrowing a couple of numbers to make the equation easy and then pull them back out.
392 / 4 == (400 - 8) / 4 == (100-2) = 98
376 / 4 == (400-24)/4 =100-6=94
Of course it goes up a level when the remainder isn't evenly divisible. But I still find it's something I can handle in my head.
371 / 4 == (400-29)/4= 100-7¼ =100-7.25=92.75
14% of 200 == 28% of 100 == 28
You can also do 200% of 14, which I find more straightforward.
Why do you have to divide on both sides in your example with 14% of 200?
Are you just out here doing common core math on here like it's just some smart trick to make math easier?! You dirty bastard, some conservative is going to see this and think it's a good idea, then they'll just innocently do it in front of their conservative friends and all hell will break loose. Homosexual fornication will suddenly run rampant through the group and those few that can resist the call of the devils numbers will have to cull the rest. You know... Actually... I am not completely against that now that I think about it...
Huh. Learning a fun and cool math trick was not on the list of expected outcomes for today, but I'll take it!
Today I learned, thank you wise panzer
Wise panzer of the lake. There are other wise panzers, but they are malevolent, untrustworthy.
Surprised how many people don’t know this. I suspect it is because people forget that percent literally means per 100 or /100 and the of is standing in for multiplication. So 6% of 50 is 6/100 * 50 or 6 * 50 * 1/100
I have been looked at like a wizard saying "oh that's just the amount times 1.2"
Teaching stats and using percentages now and again, it's not really that useful of a tool most of the time since you aren't usually working with an easy number like 50 (Or 10, 20, 25, etc.).
Usually what I'm doing is breaking it down into manageable parts (factors), so 6% is 5% + 1% which I can usually do in my head regardless of the number (or if 5% hard, work in increments of 1%, which I can multiply by 6).
It's a pretty common strategy to with with factors. Just surprised how many of my students don't know it!
Yeah, now calculate 6% of 36
Edit: Replies itt make me believe that everyone on Lemmy is a chatbot
1% of 36 is .36, and .36 * 6 = 2.16. I'm a fan of this method most of the time, though the one in the OP is good for some math problems.
Bout tree fiddy
6% of 36 is 0.06 * 6². 6³ = 216 so 2.16
3.6/2+0.36 = 2.16
(10% of 36 halved, so 5%, plus 1% of 36)
36% of 6 is roughly 33.(3)% of 6 which is 2.
3% of 6 is .18 so about 2.18
I usualy get the value of 1% and then multiple that back to original, so:
1% of 36 is 0.36 (just move 2 spaces) and thats times 6 which is 2.16
Sweet, thanks Panzer of the Lake!
maths is the same in both case but I get it, for small numbers this is useful
Danke
For those who want to dive deeper into the lake and the wisdom of the panzer: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commutative_property
I'm still doing a rule of threes either way.
50*.06 = 5061/100 = .5*6
But you're still just multiplying 5*6 and then moving the decimal point around. So don't sweat it.
Surprisingly not as useful as u would think unfortunately
This is blowing my fucking mind like an artillery shell
Yeah, I personally find it a lot easier to compute 13% of 17, rather than 17% of 13.
Same with 375% of 20 rather than 20% of 375.
.2*13=2.6
.03*13=0.39
2.6-0.39=2.21
My brain is maybe a weird place 😂
I guess it's easy to miss that m% just means ×m÷100
6% of 50 means 50 × 6 ÷ 100, and because multiplication and division have the same order of operations you can switch them around. so it is also equal to 6 × 50 ÷ 100, in which you can simplify 50 ÷ 100 into 1 ÷ 2, but you could always do that: 50 × 6 ÷ 100 = 1 × 6 ÷ 2.
this "shortcut" however is of extremely limited use. basically for taking a percentage of anything other than things that can very easily divide or multiply 100 like 50 in this example or maybe 10 or 500 it's nearly useless.
Hence 90% of 6 is still hard.
It's because percent just means ×0.01 and multiplication can be rearranged