DOJ Can’t Tie Suspected Kirk Killer to Left Like MAGA Wants

Charlie could have been run over by a monster truck with TRUMP painted on the side with a fuck your feelings flag and the driver could have worn a maga hat and cut off sleeves shirt and the right would still try to connect it to LGBTQ+.

Literally the first thing they said before anyone even figured out where the shot came from.
An tee fuh

Not going to. This was all predicted by people smarter than I, during the first Trump admin.

MAGAt gets primed for violence for years. MAGAt figures out he's been lied to all along. MAGAt uses that penchant for violence on the scum that has been lying to him. The only difference is that people assumed politicians would be the target.

1.) His steam acct name was apparently DonaldTrump, no progressive or liberal is going to want to be associated with that, even ironically.

2.) If you didn't vote in '22 or '24 & you were legally able, you're not a progressive or liberal, full stop.

I find it very hard to believe that that username would be available on Steam even in 2018 or whenever he made the account, unless you just mean the username that you can change to anything and not the actual login username associated with an account and profile
- I don't think login names are public. I could be wrong.
if you didn't vote in
Not a liberal. Some kinds of progressive don't see electoralism as worth their time. Especially if they live in deep reb/blue districts.
- Some kinds of progressive don’t see electoralism as worth their time.
  ...
  You gotta do that last year, or a little while later, after people have forgotten. Trying to say it doesn't matter who wins elections right now is... not going to be convincing.
  It's actually exactly like what happened with vaccines. We had so many years living in a society which didn't have active urgent throw-you-in-the-camps-for-no-reason tyranny that people stopped believing it was really real, and they're still out confidently saying it's not worth taking basic easy steps to prevent.
- Because they can't do the bare minimum?

The officials also voiced that it would be difficult to bring federal charges against Robinson, as Robinson allegedly committed the crime in Utah and is a resident of the Beehive State. Furthermore, Kirk was an influencer activist, and not an elected official.

Furthermore, Kirk was an influencer activist, and not an elected official.
Exactly. Not an assassination. I hate that people keep calling it that.
- When a Nazi gets killed it's called 'a good job'
- I've never heard being elected official as a criteria for the term, the dictionary definition of assassination is
  "the premeditated act of killing someone suddenly or secretively, especially a prominent person."
  And there have been plenty of non-electoral assassinations, including those by (or of) mob figures, journalists, and many others.
- It’s still an assassination. The definition is broad enough to include the killing of any public figure by surprise attack.
- It was a pyrotechnics accident, is all.

Charlie Kirk is STILL ALIVE! These are Just Crisis ACTORS! DONT let these CriSIs Actors STEAL your freedoms!

Alex Jones can swallow a bunch of draino.
- Have you seen what he looks like? Jones chugs that shit like I chug gamersupps.
Yeah the assassination was just a psyops.
🙄
Grok, is that you?
- They hadn't programmed grok to lie. It told the truth.

I thought they just skipped that step and hoped nobody noticed?

I love how any time someone clearly has ties to the right-wing they're a "troubled individual."

I haven't encountered many right-wingers who weren't "troubled individuals".
Or at least individuals with very troubling opinions and beliefs.

“Right-wing groups have been responsible for over ten times more terror attacks than left-wing groups since 2002, according to a study conducted by the ADL. The Justice Department recently found similar numbers in its own study. It recently scrubbed that study from its website.”

Lol.

Dear MAGAts, you killed Charlie Kirk.

Well they canceled Jimmy Kimmel for pointing out this very thing, then put on their other face and said they’re going after “hate speech”…. Right after the president tried ramping up the hate and saying it was the lefts fault. So I guess if they’re taking “hate speech” so seriously they need to take a good loooong look at themselves in the mirror

This sounds just as ridiculous as "Accountants can't make $2 + $2 = $1 trillion like MAGA wants."

You mean they can't publicly make shit up to fit the narrative

What we saw in the Epstein debacle was their best….

That they keep trying instead of finding the relationship that do exist says everything you need to know to oppose everything they do.

Its no fun when you can't make a lie stick. For people that really believe you make the truth it must sting when you find out you cant.

Yes they can, and they will find a way lol

Its called making shit up.
- They already do. He was living with a trans person so clearly was infected by violent trans terrorism. Whatever that means.

Can they even make the narrative stick that it was a 30-06? People need to be looking into that more. A 30-06 is a gun meant to take down an Elk or a Grizzly Bear. I don't think the video we saw lines up with the 30-06 narrative.

Who is trump going to fire over this?

I'm sure they'll all be fired soon.

Finally a headline that tells the truth.

Archive link

If we assume this random YouTube man is credible, and I see no reason to doubt him, the DOJ can't even tie suspected Kirk killer to the actual killing of Charlie Kirk.

I watched that the other day, and he makes some compelling points.
- I also think it's very bizarre their constant complaining that the suspect isn't "cooperating."
  What is it that they expect him to do? I have a guess, of course. The way it usually works (after the suspect initially agrees to talk with them without a lawyer, creating all kinds of problems for themselves), is that they build the case, and the lawyer who's now in touch with the client finally has a chance to tell them to shut the fuck up going forward. My guess is that they really want him to "cooperate" with building their case for them, and he's not, and that upsets them because it's giving them real problems.

Don't let Disney hear you

Uh oh. Daily beast must be discontinued now.

Oh boy do I need glasses.

Read the title as DOJA CAT Tie Suspected..........

It’s clearly a cover up by the left to protect the left!!!

I know plenty people who want healthcare and social safetynets, but who hate brown people, and vote for far right lunatics. Having a single left-ish opinion, doesn't mean all their beliefs fit that. We have no idea wether this person even tolerates other trans-people, or if it was just an exception for someone they love, and felt Charlie was a direct threat to that person.
What I'm saying is, right now we have no idea why this person really did it, what his motives actually were, and what his political allignment really is.
- if you discuss how people want to make society better, a large amount of these maga cultists will agree to many progressive, left-wing, reforms being the best way forward. However they will have a single issue that they are willing to throw that all away for. Immigration, racism, misogyny, gun ownership deregulation, etc.
Being pro trans is neither left nor right.
At a stretch we can label trans as being libertarian, because it's no-one else's fucking business.
The article mentions they can't tie him to any left-wing groups so Trump can crack down on them.
So the right is stuck without any group to go after since he acted independently.
- What do you mean without any groups to go after? Obviously they're gonna take down the terrorist cells that caused this by the name of Discord and Steam.
There's been studies that right wingers are the biggest consumers of trans porn.
- It explains a lot about why right-wing politicians insist that the very existence of trans people in public is pornographic.
  They're outing their own kinks in broad daylight.
He was raised, in a deep red area in a deep red state, in a right-wing, MAGA environment his whole life. That's all he knew from the time he was born. He came from a pro gun / hunter family, deeply entrenched in that culture from what he said in his texts and how he felt responsible for his grandfather's bolt action rifle.
He was stewed in it, forged by it his whole life and those are the values and morality that formed him.
If it maybe had a moment of experimentation or a particular openness at some point in his young twenties doesn't change the facts of his upbringing and what truly formed him to take the actions he did.

Maybe, who gives a fuck who he was connected to? If you are trying to prove that the other side is worse, Ive got some bad news for you. You are both horrible people, who laugh and cheer at the murder and assault of human beings for the crime of not agreeing with you. This will be hard to hear for those of you too balls deep in the culture wars to know any better, but its the truth.

And for the love of all fuck, stop with "the left". There is no left in America. You are ALL right wing. Its just differing degrees of it.

Also, remember that your click bait is telling you he was right wing, and their clickbait is telling them he was woke, and in a relationship with a "man who was transitioning". And so this proves beyond all doubt that he was "left wing". No. Its just all click bait to noise you all up, and get your outrage clicks. You, them, everybody. Click, click, click, get outraged. Click, click, click more.

Not agreeing who should pay the taxes or how we should distribute stuff is fine. I might get a little loud, but I see your point.
Not agreeing how centralized this or that system of coordination made for everyone's benefit should be is another one i might get loud about, but I won't cheer your death.
Not agreeing about whether we should emphasize rail water or electrical infrastructure updates first–as long as you agree we need all three, I'm barely gonna argue.
If you have some radically different vision from mine about what participation in and authorship of society looks like, I might think it's disgusting–but I probably at least want to hear it, you delusional freak.
Not agreeing on who is and isnt a person, who gets bodily autonomy, who gets to participate in society at all, and who dies in the camps–that's fighting words, and your death is cause for celebration.
I cheer for the death of Nazis. Not for people I disagree with.
He didn't want black people to have rights, and thought they were unqualified to be in any position of power. He thought women should reject feminism and submit to their husbands. He spread COVID and vaccine misinformation. He denied climate change.
That's not disagreement, that's denial of reality and vocal attempts to subjugate minorities of this country.
But he wasn't just some random delusional idiot, he was a mouthpiece for fascism. And I giggle every single time I see the video of his death when I watch it on my phone.
Fuck that piece of shit. At least he opened a gender neutral bathroom with his fucking grave.
- None of that is true. Thats just clickbait headlines getting you all ragey and engaged to make money off you.
  He never said he didnt want black people to have rights. He said that the writing of the civil rights act was poor. He said that he understood and supported the purpose, just not how it was written. The reason he gave for this was because it was now being used to overcorrect, and that as a result it was harming white people. Up to you if agree with that statement or not. I personally do and dont. Ive seen examples of it in action, but never enough that its a problem worth rioting about.
  Which leads us on to the "unqualified" statement. That was again, misquoted. He was talking about DEI, and how it was influencing hiring practices. Which again, is true. I just dont know how widespread it is to get upset. But you can look to Harvard admissions who put non white applicants above white ones, even though the white ones had better grades. In the UK the Oxford Union will have a new president in 2026. But the problem is that he should never have been there in there first place as he didnt meet the requirements for entry. But hes black, so he gets special treatment. Again in the UK, the RAF was found to be holding back white men so they could promote women and non whites, again, even though they had either performed better or it was their turn in line. This was excused by "positive discrimination.".
  You see, the problem with all the hate going around is that its only ever headline deep. The actual facts and nuance of what is being said never gets a look. So people say things like "Kirk said the civil rights act was a mistake" or "He would check pilots credentials if he was black" or "Im ok with people dying for the 2A".
  That last one, the context there was about the price we as a society pay to have nice things. The whole quote wasnt limited to the 2A, and included cars. His point was that cars cause 50k deaths every year, but we accept that price so that we can have the convenience of private transport. His point of view was that 2A was needed to protect the citizens of the US from a tyrannical government. And that if the price of that was gun deaths, then he was ok with it, in the same way that people are ok with car deaths. Again, up to you if you what you think of that argument. I disagree, as cars are licensed, people need to train to drive a car and they need to be registered etc etc etc. None of which is true of guns in most places. But the point is, he didnt just say "fuck them kids!" like so many click bait headlines said he did.
  Was he a good guy? Dont really know. I didnt really hear much about him before last week. But I am the type of cunt to read, and check facts. And damn near everything said about him last week, was a twisting of the facts. But it sure got everyone riled up didnt it? Kinda like when the right wingers get their click bait telling them that two thirds of trans women are sex offenders. Which is a lie. The actual source of that story was from the UK and was talking about 125 transgender women counted in 2017, 60 of them were convicted of sexual assault, 27 of which was rape. Do you see? This is how they get you all. They put enough truth in the headline to get you all angry, but never enough that you are all actually informed on things that are actually happening.
  You all, need to start reading beyond the headline. And start actually verifying what you are being told. For example, a random twitter post screen grabbed to imgur that then gets up loaded to reddit should not be getting more of your trust than a bunch of news sites. But this is world we live in now. And thats why it fucking sucks.

ZOMG, can we pull The Daily Beast off the air for misleading the American people?