Joe Rogan defends Kimmel and tells conservatives supporting censorship: ‘Oh my God, you’re crazy’
Joe Rogan defends Kimmel and tells conservatives supporting censorship: ‘Oh my God, you’re crazy’ | CNN Business
Nom Nom Nom...
Joe Rogan you dumb fuck.....you helped get the orange turd elected!
Nah, that would be when Ted Cruz made similar comments the other day.
Joe has always been good at knowing which side of the fence to temporarily come off of.
He's always one DMT hit from emptying his brains out on the floor and fishing for a different opinion.
Hey don’t bring DMT into this man
Joe Rogan is a drug-addled moron. Do not listen or engage with anything he says, even if you feel like you agree.
You got it all wrong. He's not drug addicted. He's brain damaged from his mma days. Apparently brain damage leads to conservative thoughts. Look at Fetterman.
There's a talk show video out there where the host is conservative (it's well known I just can't remember the name). Some guy is on the phone talking about how he's seen the light of the GOP and the host asks what changed, and he says he got kicked in the head by a horse.
The host looks a little shocked and says something like, okay moving on.
Diminishing capacity for empathy, tendency towards selfishness, quick to anger, no shame... checks out
That's crazy man, have you ever tried DMT?
He's a massive every-drug-under-the-sun addict
It's not really that we agree with him. It's that his listeners get really annoying and this may help to settle them down about this.
Obligatory fuck the unfunny Joe Rogan who ushered this fascist back in.
There will be nothing more unintentionally funny than buying a comedy club and putting a photo of himself next to comedy greats.
Elephant Graveyard sends his regards
Fuck you Joe
Careful Joe. That's sounding dangerously unconservative, and you know what the crazy conservative gun people do to those conservative voices that aren't conservative enough for them.
They always have been you fucking idiot, even when you became more like them.
Didn't he defend comedians who were getting cancelled for jokes by the left too, like Chappel? What's the surprise here? Ideological consistency does seem rare these days and "doing one thing while bitching when that same thing is done to you" is quite en vogue, and nobody acknowledges that the systems we put in place to control our opposition will be turned on us the instant they have a chance, but this (defending kimmel for jokes regardless of the politics) seems in line with what Rogan has always said afaik.
He helped enable the rise of the Alt Right by giving them serious air time.
Also, Dave Chappelle never got "cancelled". He's still getting Netflix specials and still booking shows. For some reason, people will pay him to call them poor.
Having people write critical articles about someone isn't the same as getting "cancelled".
If simply giving the alt-right a platform causes them to become more popular in society, that means there are deeper issues, giving them a platform isn't the real issue.
The real issue is that society is in a state where they are willing to support alt-right.
I mean, you identified the surprise - consistent ideology. That's not generally something anyone could accuse the right of lately.
"Can you believe Biden said that? That means he's too old to be president!"
"Uh, Trump said that"
"Oh, nevermind then"
Ideological consistency, my ass.
more like he defended Chappelle who rightfully received criticism, but never lost any work, money, or influence as a result.
He's typically silent on the matter. So what's surprising is he actually spoke up for once.
Plausible deniabiliity. That's all
Well his comedian friends would disown him if he didnt and I genuinely think he still takes pride in his work.
I dont like Rogans politics but I actually respect him as a comic. I dont love his material, but in the same way that Katt Williams isnt writing jokes for suburban white folks, Amy Schumer is writing jokes for wine moms and woo girls. I can respect the joke writing and act even if it doesnt resonate. I think he is a good (not great) comic and probably still cares greatly about it.
Yeah I'm not a fan or anything but professionally he's been pretty consistent with his humor. I remember him calling out Carlos Mencia for stealing other (smaller comedians) material.
It was apparently pretty true so it really made Rogan look like a good dude, standing up for his peers against someone who was really starting to blow up (by stealing their material).
I wonder if Rogan realizes that he's part of the reason we've ended up here?
About as much as a child who shit their pants and then points at another kid saying they smell like shit.
Like most rich ass conservatives, he only cared about advancing his bank account. He knew his audience and double downed. He know he won't lose those listeners. He could fuck Hilary Clinton tomorrow and they would still celebrate it.
You.. you made the crazy Joe.
also if you haven't seen it, I highly recommend this: How Comedy Was Destroyed by an Anti-Reality Doomsday Cult
That doc is a masterpiece.
Also, ironically, though it's a serious documentary, it is also funnier than Joe Rogan's standup.
Hell yeah.
You think so, Joe? You think the fascists might be crazy?
fuck this grift. this dude did more propoganda minutes for Maga than Charlie did, he doesn't give af about free speech beyond crying about how "censored" he is into the world's largest microphone
He said that if such interference were really happening and conservatives were supporting such behavior they were “crazy” because eventually they themselves would be the target of such censorship
What's really wild is that his biggest concern is that the people doing the fascist thing could become the target of it later. There's no dawning of 'oh maybe the people doing this aren't so good' no, he's worried that the other people who have been warning that they are fascists might pursue them later with the fascist precedent they are putting in place.
Joe should be much more afraid of the next Groyper aiming for him. Conveniently located in Texas.
So uh, the groyper narrative is now about as solid as the trans narrative. Everything's pointing to the guy growing up in a conservative household and disagreeing with his family and all the hate.
"Oh no! The fascists I supported are being fascists!"
Joe is just what happens when an anti-establishment nut becomes the establishment.
Really kept his head down for a few days first huh?
Well, no he didn't. Not really. I haven't heard it (and don't intend to) but according to the quotes in this article he didn't do that at all.
“The problem is the companies, if they are being pressured by the government – so if that’s real – and if people on the right are like ‘yeah, go get ’em,’ oh my God, you’re crazy. You’re crazy for supporting this because this will be used on you,” he said.
If, if, if. Wouldn't want to risk upsetting anyone would you?
Yep this is just hedging his bets and the media sainwashing him, as they're required to do for all right wing personalities
Hey, this walking talking cyst finally got something right.
Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day...
Fucking dopes all of them. Joe Rogan and all his cocksucking fans. Fucking dipshits the lot of them.
Too little too late, Joe.
Womp womp
Rogan is spineless. Tells the people supporting Trump and his policies that they are crazy but doesn’t have the balls to actually say anything negative about Trump.
Rogan is a heavy cannabis and psychedelics user in Texas where they’re pushing to outlaw even Delta8 THC. He’s in a situation where he doesn’t want to leave for a legal jurisdiction, and could be made an example at any time. The guy could absolutely be singled out: at best he could be made to leave Texas, and at worst be jailed for his cannabis use and possession.
The most useful of idiots.
Don't give this guy any visibility, downvote the thread and upvote other ones.
Joe faces the same issue that Tucker does.
Both have substantial influence, and in Tucker's case substantial wealth.
Given this, I'll borrow a term from the Right to spell it out: We need more than virtue signaling.
Substantial harm requires something more than some face-turn tease.
As a thought experiment, put aside the well deserved hate you might have for Joe, and think about what harm he could inflict on the cult, if he got it in his head to do so.
Rogan is valued at $250M, 5X Fuckhead Carlson.
And not long ago, he will made a living forcing people to eat bugs.
Forcing is a little strong of a word there. Even he later said, and probably helped a few folks realize how shit america is, that it was horrible what people would do for the prize money.
Besides, eating bugs isn't a terrible thing. I'd be more concerned about the elk penises, honestly.
Rogan has made inexplicable wealth from his show.
Rogan is a former comedian. Of course he’s going to defend fellow comedians. This should not be surprising to people!
Keyword former He's subconsiously defending a better version of his younger self
True. But I'm still surprised at how many not-completely-unhinged opinions Joe Rogan has. Mind you, he's still far from being a sane person, but I always just assumed he was a differently flavored Alex Jones.
I’d say he’s more gullible than unhinged. He basically believes every guest who comes on his show, even if they just contradicted the previous guest. It’s very strange!
Why not invite him to Montreal for a conference. Oh right, he'd rather go to Russia.
Horseshoe theory??
No shit, Toe Rogaine, really?
"Anyways, gotta get back to saying slurs at the mothership!"
An important reminder is that Kimmel's monologue did not say anything slightly negative about Charlie Kirk's demonic zionazi and replacement theorgy genocidal supremacism. He only made fun of Trump for interviews in which he was asked about any sympathy he had for his dead dear friend, getting deflect-weaved into "we're building the bestest ballroom in the white house now".
He got in trouble for saying that Kirk was killed by his own side.
He didn't even say that though, this is driving me insane, he said that Trump and them were doing everything they could to pin the blame on the left and score political points from it, which is undeniable. He didn't say anything about who he actually thought the shooter was.
He implied it but he straight up was factually saying they're trying real hard to show it wasn't one of their guys. It definitely wasn't any of the people MAGA wanted to pin it on.
Turns out it was some kind of apolitical zoomer whose friends were personally affected by Kirk's rhetoric likely because the problem with living in the most conservative US state is that a lot of people around you are probably repeating the vitriol.
There's still a decent good case to be made that MAGA bullied this kid into killing Kirk by threatening people he loves.
By that logic all maga should be in trouble for saying it was a dem
The 2 candidates are Bill Ackman or Nick Fuentes "influence". That Carr, Trump, Sinclair need to protect one of those 2 shows how corrupt democracy is.
Next election needs to promise to nationalize with no compensation all zionazi media, zeroing out all directors and exectutives wealth, decitizenize any politician pledging allegiance to Israel, zeroing out all of their donors, and nationalize defense and oil industry.