Sharing creative stuff on Social Media

I said for other people's praise, not their money!

There’s a very common pattern of “I’m going to focus more on my own life” you get from creators as they realize this.

The financial equation of having talent and using it for free stuff for people on the internet is not a stable one. Even when you decide your reward is attention, the mental toll ends up outweighing that meager reward.

Who hurt you? No one was talking about people doing this shit for a living or for the entertainment of anyone but themselves.

3600+ plus comments is awesome dude. I dont know if theres a leaderboard but that has to be a high score.

Well, you did respond to this, so that's a great start!

I recognize your name, so you're doing something right! 😄

Just do your best to make this a fun place, both for you and others.

There's even a few people on here I wish would post less if they want this place to stay good! 😜

I did see you had Superbowl on your list and I'm always happy to see other people promote it. It's big enough now that I've slowed down promoting it myself so I don't seem pushy. It's been a ton of work, but it's with it to know it makes people a little happier each day.

News, memes, and tech do seem pretty dominating here, and while it's nice getting notification of all that stuff in one place, I still prefer to go to actual news sites I trust. If I spend too much time doing it here, I feel I read more comments than actual articles, and half the comments seem to be made before actually reading the article, so it's easy to get misinformed or biased opinions rather than facts

I've not sought out any direct help for a few reasons. The primary reason is my content is all stuff that I like. It's a labor of love and not a job. I share what I do because I like it and I think you might like it too. If I asked someone to help me out, I'd feel like they're working for me and trying to post what I'd want, but what they'd want. Bigger projects like the long articles and Owl of the Year are also my personal vision, and honestly, I want those done exactly my way, so again, I don't want to make someone else carry out my vision and be frustrated if they can't do that

Also, I feel the people that create the communities should be more active in their actual management. I didn't start Superbowl, so I'm just a guest. I share my stuff and try to make it a better place, and that's the end of my role. Earlier on, I thought it might be better to join with Birding or some other community, or maybe instead start a Raptors community where I could also do hawks, eagles, vultures, etc. Superbowl had a good bit of Reddit momentum, which I believe helped make things self-sustaining faster than for some other communities. I think combining small groups would be the way to go for a lot of things, but that isn't my call.

Ultimately for growth though, it can't be a daily responsibility for anyone. Maybe if you had a group of 5-10 people that can post daily, like those big politics, news, tech groups do, but most communities would be better served by 30 people posting 1 things a month than 1 person posting 30 things a month. It makes it diverse, and that will pull in more people as the flavor of the group will be less one note, and losing one or 2 people doesn't hurt the group as much.

As much as you like my content, their might be some that like different things than me. Like I don't enjoy many of the really small owls as much. When I do post them, many love them, but I don't post them much because they don't interest me. If someone that did love them shared them passionately, that would invigorate that group more than I could. Also, if you didn't like my writing style or if I just write too much or too little, a handful of people writing in their own voice would be great.

I do think some instances have communities to try and get inactive communities into new hands, but if they're dead, they're probably not big enough to be self-sustaining. I see you post to a few music communities, but it would probably be easier and reach more eyes if they were under a broader scope than synthwave and gothic industrial. People on here seem to have great interest in music discovery in a way that humans can do that algorithms can't. Perhaps having a broader scope where you can say, hey if you like "popular song x" you should check out "under the radar song y" that might get more attention. I'm into music creation and synths more than most random people, and I couldn't tell you what electronic music is in what genre, so my chance of stumbling on one of those posts is small at this point even though I'm much closer to your audience. But the principals of being defederated from other groups seems to fly in the face of people seeing they're not getting traffic, reaching out to each other, and merging control of their communities.

But I think that's necessary. Just about all of us probably stumbled upon an already established and powerful state of Reddit, where we didnt need to put in as much work to get eyes. We could jump in a sub with thousands or millions of eyes already on it. We don't have that power here yet. But we're also small enough but large enough you can get a following relatively quick if you do put in the work.

This is getting long, and I've probably given you a bit to think about, so I'll leave it here for now. It's given me some things to think about too but having to type out my thoughts. We all want Lemmy to be big and great, but it's gotta occur naturally. We can't force it. We've got to look and experiment and see what works and what doesn't. Evolution doesn't happen in one generation, it takes many trials and errors. We've just got to keep at making this place the best we can and the rest will follow when it's time.

Yeesh, think I got smallpox from this comment.