Skip Navigation

Memes @lemmy.ml

Stamets [Mirror] @startrek.website

2y ago

This is why I cleverly have no RAM

71 comments

Chrome tabs are scary - unlike our sponsors:
Firefox. Firefox is a free and open source web browser that is not just nice to your RAM, making it run smoothly alongside games or on older machines, but also respects your privacy.
Unlike Chrome, it doesn't track every move you make online and it's not only more customizable, it also doesn't threaten ad-blockers and the free web in general. Check out Firefox with the link below!
https://www.mozilla.org/en/firefox/new/
- I actually switched to chrome many years ago because firefox was abusing system resources and chrome was much lighter.
  
  I did the same! I’m now given to understand that that was Google’s goal with Chrome - make the easiest-to-use and most lightweight browser to bring everyone in, then ramp up the trackers and bloat. I think I need to export my bookmarks and look into Firefox again…
  
  I use Firefox, TOR, and even Edge sometimes these days for its nifty "Drop" feature. You'll never catch me using Chrome.

People also forget that most of the actual calculations were done on paper first; the computers were basically just executing precalculated instructions.
 
This is the stack of code used for the navigation software for the Apollo program.
 
(Fun fact: standing next to it is Margaret Hamilton, director of NASA's Software Engineering Division & the lead of the team who wrote that code.)
- Additional fun fact: Margaret Hamilton is the person who coined the term "software engineering"
  
  Ooh, I didn't know that. That is a fun fact! 😁
- These are multiple printouts of the code. The computer did not only execute precalculated instruction. (This would be a sequencer BTW.). Try it yourself AGC.
  
  That is pretty cool. I might try it tonight since I'm at work right now. Thanks!
  Though, to be fair, I did say that most of the code was precalculated.

Some people still don't seem to comprehend the difference between an embedded system and a general purpose computer.
- We've had general purpose computers for decades but every year the hardware requirements for general purpose operating systems keep increasing. I personally don't think there has been a massive spike in productivity using a computer between when PCs usually had 256-512mb to now where you need at least 8gb to have a decent experience. What has changed are growing protocol specs that are now a bloated mess, poorly optimised programs and bad design decisions.
  
  🎶 JAVASCRIIIPT 🎶
  
  I personally don’t think there has been a massive spike in productivity using a computer between when PCs usually had 256-512mb to now
  For general use/day to day stuff like web browsing, sure, I agree, but what about things like productivity and content creation? Imagine throwing a 4K video at a machine with 512 MiB RAM - it would probably have troubles even playing it, let alone editing/processing.
  
  I like to have more than one tab opened on my browser.
  
  You have no clue what you're talking about.
- Apollo 11 never had to deal with 47 different tracking cookies.

"we put Kanto and johto on a single cartridge"
- Yeah, but they were reusing tilesets an-
  looks at modern pokemon*
  Uh. You know what, you have a point.
- It took till Scarlet and Violet for us to get more than one region in a game
  Kitikami and Unova
  That's parhetic

That's true I guess. But it probably helped that they had a big fucking rocket to get there.

Meanwhile I have 16 GBs, and I feel that I should update to 32...
- You don't think you'll ever really use all 32GB at the same time until you're running a virtual machine or two and open task manager to see that you're consistently using over 82% of your RAM, which happened to me today.
- I upgraded to 64gb last week
  
  Did it work? I struggle with 32 sometimes, but I am blaming it on the software

4kb plus literal rocket scientists. On the other side of it you have 8gbs and my dumb ass

Isn't there some computer science hypothesis (or whatever) about how the more complex computers get the more inefficient they must get as well?
- Yeah, the average PC probably has 5 separate installations of Chrome, for different apps
  
  Fuck electron, all my homies hate electron
- Computers haven't become less efficient. They can still crunch numbers like crazy.
  It's the software. Why spend a month making something when you can just download some framework that does what you want in one hour. Sure, it used 10 times as much memory and CPU, but that's still only a 1 second delay with a modern computer and the deadline for release is approaching fast.
  Repeat that process often enough and you have a ridiculously bloated mess of layers upon layers of software. Just for fun you can start up some old software and play around with it in an emulator to be baffled how quick it all works on a modern system.

For people who want to know more about the fascinating computer in the Apollo space craft.
34C3 - The Ultimate Apollo Guidance Computer Talk
Core rope memory
Moonjs: An Online Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) Simulator
- They even had some hand-braided ram or whatever for systems that abso-fucking-luteley must not fail
- Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
  34C3 - The Ultimate Apollo Guidance Computer Talk
  Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
  I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
  
  There's an even better alternative on the CCC's website, the original source of the video ;)
  https://media.ccc.de/v/34c3-9064-the_ultimate_apollo_guidance_computer_talk

Hey, I'd like to see the rocket load an entire redux store into local storage!

Unused ram is wasted ram
- Unused RAM practically does not exist. The OS will use it for disk caching.

This is mainly due to modern day web bloat and lazy inefficient coding

16 GB RAM 8GB nVidia and you can play Immortals Of Aveum at 30 FPS, (maybe)

Meanwhile apple still selling macbooks with 8gb ram

71 comments