Kalcifer @ Kalcifer @sh.itjust.works

All of this user's content is licensed under [CC BY 4.0](https://creativeco

---

Read more

Posts

160

Comments

1,684

Joined

2 yr. ago

recieve vs. receive

I don't have paid access to the linked article, so the following is only going off of what I can glean from the snippet of the article that is viewable without paying ^[1.1]: One can view the allegedly ^[2] deleted study ^[1.2] here ^[3]. The article is currently still unavailable from the NIJ ^[4].

When was the last time that you've tried using it?

[…] Looks pretty cool

Thank you 😊

[…] what kind of referencing software are you using for writing this kind of comment? […]

None 😄 It's all done manually by me, atm. I'm sort of trying to iteratively develop my own referencing style/standard. More to your comment, though, I am considering writing a script to help me generate the references for things, as it can be a bit tedious for me at the moment to try and scrape the data when citing sources.

Would maybe a FreeCAD assembly ^[3] be what you're looking for? Here is an example tutorial on making an assembly ^[1]. You can also animate an assembly ^[2][3.1].

Are you okay with a self-hosted solution? If so, you could, for example, self-host FreshRSS ^[1], and then use it to scrape a feed using XPath ^[2]. I can elaborate further on the method if you are interested.

See the latter part of my comment.

[…] thanks for following up! […]

You're welcome 😊

[…] There have been publicly released FBI powerpoint slides that link meshtastic radios to “extremist” groups. […]

Do you have a source, by chance?

[…] OP tell me your conclusion for best hardware licence when you get there.

I think I'm just going to go with CERN-OHL-S ^[1]. I have yet to find anything better, and @ganymede@lemmy.ml raised some good points regarding it ^[2], imo.

imo i wouldn’t overlook CERN too much due to apparent obscurity. that’s CERN as in WWW & LHC.

plus it’s specifically designed for hw, unlike most of the others which are more likely to lean sw centric? […]

I think these are fair points!

[…] When some South Koreans were jailed for upholding my license terms when they spotted their employer violating them […]

If they had a court case, do you, by chance, have a source for it?

[…] I thought only the BSD license allowed corporations to profit from your work. […]

The MIT License allows this as well ^[1].

[…] It was just explained to me by many on Lemmy that not just GPL but the actual definition of Open Source requires that you allow large corporations to profit off your work. […]

IMO, you can define it, or any word, however you want; all that matters is that the definitions are agreed upon between the parties engaging in conversation.

Enlightening /s 😜

I am so confused.

My poor RX 6600 that is driving a 2560x1440p monitor has no chance ^[1].

::: spoiler References

1. Type: Meta
   • At 2560x1440, the RX 7600XT performs at 17.9FPS in Borderlands 4 ^[2]. Given that the RX 7600XT is, in general, more performant than the RX 6600 ^[3], it is presumed that the RX 6600 will perform very poorly at 2560x1440 in Borderlands 4.
2. Type: Article. Title: "Borderlands 4 Performance Benchmark Review - 30+ GPUs Tested". Author: "W1zzard". Published: 2025-09-12T12:44:00+00:00. Accessed: 2025-09-15T01:42Z. Publisher: "www.techpowerup.com" ("TECHPOWERUP"). URI: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/borderlands-4-performance-benchmark/5.html.
   • Type: Image. Location: §"Performance">"[…]2560x1440[…]". URI: https://tpucdn.com/review/borderlands-4-performance-benchmark/images/performance-2560-1440.png.

     

3. Type: Webpage. Publisher: "UserBenchmark". Accessed: 2025-09-15T01:44Z. URI: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-7600-XT-vs-AMD-RX-6600/m2280266vs4128.

   

   • The RX 7600-XT has an average score of 49.6%, surpassing the RX 6600's average score of 36.4% (higher is better). :::

Feelin the Bern?

What are you referring to?

Who's the bottom left of the eastern side?