John Cartwheel would like a word with both of them
132John Cartwheel couldn't do what he did without AElfred Rüning being the first person to figure out how to run in the early 9th century.
YOU try doing a Cartwheel without Running first.
16Sure, ignore the foundational findings of Magnus Skïpping and Toliver Hops. Might as well just say Thomas Walker was useless. What kind of crazy world are we living in that ignores history!
7
A cousin, second removed from Whil Wilson of the Wheeler family.
7
The fact that Google suggests adding reddit to the end of the search term there is something.
75oh nice catch, i didn't even see that! yeah it's catching on, but maybe also their biggest downfall, because there's a whole lot of shitposting going on there too. I'm always delighted when they return an article from the Onion and present it as a fact
38
Once humanity finally realises how bad AI is, can we make meme pages shelters for those poor orphan models?
57We already know. It's the most obvious thing in the world. Our overlords just don't care.
20also, it should've been obvious before, right? AI has been around since the 1950s
3
"History is written by the
victorssatirists that fooled the mysterious 'answers box'"56If that ends up our legacy it would be pretty funny
10
Pff, everyone knows that Sebastian Somersaült paved the way for all that came after him, back in 1062.
50Marcus Saint Handstaand turned the world in its head in 1060 and nobody every talks about him it's always Sebastian this Sebastian that...
17Marcus Gainer?
2
I'm living the prequel to Idiocracy.
39We all are
6
Google should check their sources. I think they are wrong.
38Get your shit together, Jimmy Google.
48
I wish they would just let ai always give these silly answers instead of patching them. Ai is dumb as shit but the bullshit answers are often comedy gold. I need these laughs in my life.
24THIS is what "AI" will really be used for. Making bullshit*t.
19LLMs are great at their task if you consider they were designed for bullshitting
13It IS stealing our jobs!
8
I've always assumed many of these are just editting element text, but mobile that seems more effort than worth. Is there a way to quickly confirm them if not using/having access to the feature?
17I did a search and got a similar result:
31Welp, that's enough for me to assume 80% of these be real lol. Now I feel like I'm missing out, but I don't think I am.
9
It's real
19Assuming AI Overview does not cache results, they would be generated at search-time for each user and "search-event" independently. Even recreating the same prompt would not guarantee a similar AI Overview,
so there's no way to confirm.Edit: See my comment below for what I actually meant to say
4I do that with LLM a fair bit. If just using GPTs website for something that should be simple, I often prompt the same thing several times and choose the best iteration as a base.
1The best tools are inconsistent!
0
It was funnier when Mitchell and Webb did it.
And also it was funnier because it wasn't something people actually trust to give them the correct answer to something, but rather a sketch comedy radio show.
17Now do you recon: did freddy mercury eat mercury?
14At this point I have von idea if most of these are faked or not but it’s funny and definitely plausible after the pizza glue.
11I opened Google for the first time in three months just to try this lmao
19It is real and it is glorious.
5
Schools have said forever that not everything you read online is true and NOW AI companies and people are surprised
Newsgroups and BBSs were full of tomfoolery
11Thus, challenging someone became known as “fronting.”
10There's no way they both named their signature moves after themselves.
I still wonder if whoever invented the bottle flip has "bottle flip" in their name.
8It checks out. They were closely related to John Dark Souls and John Sekiro who were known for their incredible movement abilities - especially the latter
4
