The world's largest single-capacity floating wind platform has two turbines
The world's largest single-capacity floating wind platform has two turbines
Mingyang Smart Energy's huge 16.6 megawatt OceanX, with its double turbine "V"-shaped floating wind platform, is a game-changer.
Looks cool as hell. Here in NJ a bunch of NIMBY pricks have been fighting offshore wind because it “ruins the view” which I find laughable. Seeing clean energy being produced makes me smile, who cares if there’s a windmill on the horizon.
86Looking on Zillow, it looks like a beachfront house on Long Beach Island in New Jersey is ~$2.5-5 million.
Cross the street, go one house back from the beach -- the differentiating factor between the two being whether there's a view out over the ocean -- and the price drops to maybe $1.5-2.5 million.
So you figure that people there basically bought a house plus a window with a fancy picture in it, and that picture cost maybe one to several million dollars.
I wouldn't pay several million dollars for a fancy picture, but I imagine that if someone has done that, then they're probably liable to get pissy if people go and fiddle with it.
27Yeah that’s definitely a component, although I’m not sure it would even actually hurt the value. The beaches are public so they already cannot control that view. My favorite of their arguments was all of them very quickly becoming whale activists and stating with certainty that windmills kill whales.
16Fuck them.
But more realistically there should be a land value tax in place anyway. If the price does go down I wouldn't be totally against giving them money. But would have to be over a period of say 10 years to avoid any market inefficient panic causing a temporary dip.
13Then they can pay to produce clean energy or reduce energy usage for people in the rest of their city to make this unnecessary. Or as another commenter put it, eat our entire collective asses.
5If some dude paid a million dollars to control the ocean and the power supply of the region, then people are probably going to get pissy at the overwhelming, unearned privilege.
4
So just for context.
Fixed wind turbines can only really be put in in 60m depth or less. Water that shallow is usually close the coast though there are some exceptions like the dogger bank, but that's rare.
If you are 100m off the ground you can see 36 km out to sea. (Or be visible 36 km from shore).
The EEZ of countries, where you can install wind turbines, is 370km from shore. Currently (new tech) there seems to be floating offshore capable of operating at 1km deep waters.
If floating wind takes off. Visibility might not be an issue at all. Wind speeds are higher and more constant out out sea. It's a win, win, win. If it can be made cheap enough.
19Visited a jersey beach recently. I'd vote to put turbines up across the whole fucking coat. I don't care.
2
I quite like windmills, I'd love to have a view of some working.
14Permanently Deleted
12https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRgGmH-nCBo
Download that and set it to fullscreen on a 4k monitor on your wall.
2
Yeah, but coal fires create pretty sunsets
10Permanently Deleted
0
Y though
17Because companies have been promising tidal power for decades and it never works because the tide is really strong and full of animals, plants, and garbage that really shouldn’t be around large moving machinery.
So this is the alternative
10CorPower Ocean announces wave energy breakthrough in Portuguese waters from March.
Edit: There's also Eco Wave Power Commences Sending of Clean Electricity to the Israeli National Electrical Grid from January.
Edit2: There's the 254MW Sihwa tidal power station
Tidal power plants aren't a new technology though, so I'm guessing you meant wave power.
1
Y not?
2
What part of this don't you understand? If two turbines is good, and three turbines is better, obviously five turbines would make us the best fucking wind platform that ever existed. Comprende? We didn't claw our way to the top of the wind platform game by clinging to the two-turbine industry standard. We got here by taking chances. Well, five turbines is the biggest chance of all.
13
Sure, we could go to four blades next, like the competition. That seems like the logical thing to do. After all, three worked out pretty well, and four is the next number after three… Why innovate when we can follow? Oh, I know why: Because we're a business, that's why!
8
I'm more intetested how much per kW it produces cost, and the maintenance cost over its life span. It has to answer the question is it economical to build and maintain.
12This is true, but investing in research and subsidizing its production is how we drive costs down. We’ve done a really incredible job of getting clean energy costs down from where they were, but there’s no need to slow our efforts down now
3This could very well. Floating wind is expensive wind, so you could think of this as two turbines for the installation cost of one, or you could think of it as one pylon that produces double the power.
1
The hell does "single-capacity" mean here? The article doesn't specify.
11After searching around, I'm somewhat sure that it's an incorrect statement. The capacity usually measures the megawattage output which is certainly not one. And I found a few older articles that don't even mention "single-capacity".
It has a single mooring so I assume that's what was meant.
3It means there is one capacity, not two or even three
1I was wondering the same thing. After googling, the capacity usually refers to the megawattage.
But in this context I think single-capacity means there's just one turbine.
0
That's cheating!
3How much energy do they spend to keep this floater in place?
10? It’s anchored to the sea floor.
9
