Huge turnouts will also show the places that are actively gerrymandered and otherwise trying to suppress certain demographics from being able to vote. Which oddly enough are usually in swing states. Almost like there's a reason for preventing some people from voting.
38Gerrymandering and in fact any tampering is most effective when turnout is low.
If turnout is unusually high it actually can backfire turning very red counties into blue (they gerrymander by spreading people in heavily red counties to neighboring blue ones just enough to turn then red, so the margins are much smaller)
14
You don’t even have to turn your own state blue. Just make it more expensive for them to keep it red. Then the battleground states will have an easier time.
27Why is this NSFW?
21Got you to click for tits, D’init, Doc?
12Because Bugs Bunny is smoking hot duh
3Lotta furries on Lemmy, don't hate.
Not my vibe, but they probably don't wanna get torqued at work Edit buncha downvoting haters
3
BLUE TEXAS
BLUE TEXAS
BLUE TEXAS
13And if you got time sign up to do other stuff! Knock on doors, phone bank, talk to your neighbors, etc. I'm going to the state fair this weekend to work the voter registration booth.
Our goal shouldn't be to just beat the GOP this election, it should be to electorally launch them into the fucking sun.
10No such thing as, "My vote doesn't count."
Even if you vote for the loser, and get solidly beat down, politicians can work an Excel sheet, see the numbers creeping up on them. Even a loss gets your message counted.
2I don't reside in a state so I guess no voting for me ;p :)
Don't forget us overseas voters :)
1The only way to change this decrepit system is to vote in such numbers we flood the voting booths. If Jill Stein or Cornell West have any shot, this is what has to happen to get them in office.
-18Permanently Deleted
22You misspelled "change the voting system from First Past the Post to Ranked Choice"
10Exactly. You want other parties? Make your state switch to RCV first.
Mathematically First Past The Post always locks up to 2 parties and this can't be fixed without switching to something else (RCV is best, as it gives you provide your first choice (your favorite small party candidate), but you can also specify 2nd, 3rd etc choices as a backup making sure your vote doesn't spoil and you won't get someone you definitively don't want.
2
That's how spoiler effect work (another technique used by Republicans to kill the vote of anyone who otherwise would work against them).
If you want to make 3rd party a real option, push your local politicians to adopt Ranked Choice Voting, like Alaska and Maine did.
Voting for Jill Stein or Cornell West with First Past The Post (current system) has the same effect as not voting at all.
Those people don't register enough popularity to even be eligible for a debate, there's a snowball in hell chance of them even winning a single county.
Also Jill Stein was cooperating with Kremlin in 2016 election and helped trump by squashing some votes for Hillary.
Edit: best demonstration how GOP uses 3rd party candidates is this election for spoiler effect.
RFK Jr declared that he was running (I guess that were going that his last name will steal some Democrats). As stats were showing that he actually was pulling trump's voters away, he just suspended his campaign and of course endorsed trump (hoping that his voters will switch back to him).
Don't get fooled, until we replace FPTP, 3rd party candidate has mathematically no chance of winning and voting 3rd party is pretty much same as voting for GOP. Whatever you can say about Republicans their party ALWAYS votes on every election (including those smaller every 2 years), and Democrats only win if their base bothers to show up.
6Presuming the greenie hasn't already been told about the spoiler effect enough times to damn well know better by now.
See this is your first mistake.
The collaborators know exactly what they're doing, don't waste your breath debating them, just add them to the list with the rest of the collaborators for who to go for first if things have to get violent because of their decisions.
1Ok, so voting in mass won't do a thing? At the moment, more than 50% of registered voters are over 50 years old. With an average life span of 72 years in the US, that's folks 70% through life, at best on average. Getting everyone 40 or below registered and voting would change the game as we know it. But sorry for trying to game the system...
-1
That's how spoiler effect work (another technique used by Republicans to kill the vote of anyone who otherwise would vote against them).
If you want to make 3rd party a real option, push your local politicians to adopt Ranked Choice Voting, like Alaska and Maine did.
Voting for Jill Stein or Cornell West with First Past The Post (current system) has the same effect as not voting at all.
Those people don't register enough popularity to even be eligible for a debate, there's a snowball in hell chance of them even winning a single county.
Also Jill Stein was cooperating with Kremlin in 2016 election and helped trump by squashing some votes for Hillary.
1The Lesson I learned for Dobbs is that we need more elections forfeited to fascists in the name of "they'll learn their lesson this time guys I swear!"
FTFY.
You're either a cynically willing or braindead unwitting fascist collaborator, and you'll get the wall same as the rest if the revolution you're creaming your jorts for comes to pass you "I know how many bodies are ahead of me in the kill list" fuckass.
0There is no way to change this system by voting.
We have to take the streets and become ungovernable until our demands are met.
-2Then you end up in prison and get your wish of not being able to vote while not succeeding at changing anything.
Life doesn't have grand prizes. You can't just do a revolution and then get everything you want all at once. Progress is incremental. Even for history's successful violent revolutionaries progress took generations and you're not one of those.
1
