As far as I know it is indeed theoretically possible to catch chlamydia when having contact to infected toilet seats. But for this to happen "fresh" infected secretes in high doses must be present. Chlamydia bacteria do not survive for long outside of a body.
Therefore an infection on this way is very unlikely and such a case hasn't been reported.
For women an infection with chlamydia is especially dangerous since typical symptoms are often lacking. But leaving it untreated can pose significant hazards such as cancer and loss of fertility.
So, get yourself checked regularly.
I'd figure surface ones like herpes and crabs would be more likely, though maybe it depends on how sweaty you are and if there's a moist path from that contact point to the opening. Probably practically impossible for male genitalia unless they are resting their junk on an infected surface, though even for female genitalia, I assume they don't rest it right on the seat.
It's not even accurate, that's what gets me. It's just propaganda.
We have gynecologists. You just can't kill unborn children. Gynecologists do a lot more than just abortions. Hell, only 14% of them performed abortions back in 2011, well before Roe vs Wade.
It's not even accurate, that's what gets me. It's just propaganda.
We have gynecologists. You just can't kill unborn children. Gynecologists do a lot more than just abortions. Hell, only 14% of them performed abortions back in 2011, well before Roe vs Wade.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170127/
(I sigh to myself, knowing that nothing I am about to write is going to get through, nonetheless..)
The joke is referencing the women who are presently dying to sepsis and other pregnancy related maladies in Texas, a red state.
When doctors are questioned about why they allowed it to happen, they cite the laws which impose $100,000 fines and 99 years in prison as reason for their inaction.
So yes, in theory you have doctors who service women, but in practice they are required by law to risk life in prison to do their job.
The obvious effect of this is a skill-drain where qualified members of that profession stop practicing in Texas and newly trained doctors practice elsewhere. This trend will become more visible as time goes on and more data is collected, not that data matters to this commenter..
So yes, you are correct that they can no longer kill unborn children, however if those unborn children grow up to be a woman it is perfectly legal to allow them to die while observing.
With the above information, even a below-averaged intelligence person could piece together the context you seem to be lacking, so I suppose that gives us some insight into your intelligence. (Just kidding, I'm just shitting on you because you are a callous non-empathetic asshole).
Your take is so dumb that I assume ChatGPT gave it to you and you re-posted it thinking to yourself, "Yeah, I showed those people!", while not understanding anything you shared, the new age moron.
Accuracy: the most important part of humor! It's so crucial to comedy that I have never, not in a million years, seen someone exaggerate for humorous effect. It's simply not done in civil society: so I thank you for the bravery you've shown by shining light on this horrid case of inaccurate humor.