They can vocalise more than just their names, so if anything, they're Digimon.
34now THATS a hot take. "Pokemon are Digimon."
13That's not what he said. He said humans are Digimon, not Pokémon. Pokémon are Yugiohs, duh.
23
Idk i think that's just how Pokemon moo or whatever and the names are onomatopoetic.
4Pikachu speak at the very least has some structure to it. "Pika-Pi" is Ash's name, for instance.
6
Only those who have beaten the Pokémon league can be digimon. Because in order to be a digimon you must be the champion
4
In lore it says humans and Pokemon used to be indistinguishable. So probably yeah
26No, as regular animals exist in the Pokemon world, too. The original games had cats and dogs in some houses. The cartoon showed non Pokemon birds flying alongside pidgeys and such.
The original games also made the claim that Pokemon came from space. They only showed up after a meteorite.
24I thought they retconned that in later seasons of the anime though.
7Which part? That Pokemon came from space or the inclusion of common animals like dogs and cats? I didn't even know the show continued beyond my high school years until I saw all the talk about the show finally ending recently so I personally have no idea what they changed but the recent games I have played make the origin of the pokemon more mystical.
3
Can you put normal animals in a pokeball or is the tech bound to the specific alien dna of pokemons and can humans be put in pokeballs, and how dos this all fit in human trafficking technology?
5
Pokeballs get really sinister when you think about them too deeply.
16Pokemon is glorified dog fighting.
But wait, it gets worse. Do Pokemon experience time inside the pokeballs? It's so, they're essentially spend 99% of their life in prison.
If not, then nearly all their life is spent fighting.
4- 1
Yes. Because answering "no" is more troublesome.
8Humon.
7I think they have normal animals as well as Pokemon in the Pokemon world though.
4There are a handful of shots of regular fish in underwater scenes but that's probably due to lazy animators that didn't give a shit about the franchise they were working on.
7Eh, pretty much only the first seasons of the anime reference non-pokemon animals. All the media for the past 20 years only mention other Pokemon when talking about food, prey, etc.
5
I thought Pokémon were not animals at all but their own beings separate from the animal kingdom
4Pokemon aren't "animals", they're kami.
4Cirno is a Pokemon.
1
A true philosopher
3And the gods are the trainers
3Today, we hunt he most dangerous Pokémon
2Aren't there non-pokemon animals in pokemon?
1all humans are animals
all dogs are animals
therefore humans are dogs
not a very good argument imo
-1but that's just straight up not the same logic at all
8You're doing all A are in C, all B are in C =⟩ A is in B, which makes no sense and isn't what they said.
They said all A are in B, all B are in C =⟩ A are in C, which is true by the transitive property.
All humans are animals
All animals are Pokemon
Therefore all humans are Pokemon
4All humans are animals All dogs are animals Not all animals are dogs Not animals are humans But all the animals in modern Pokemon are Pokemon So the question is Does animal == Pokemon If so human are Pokemon But if animal != Pokemon Then humans != Pokemon and human == animal
2
