'Kids Online Safety Act' will deliberately target trans content, senator admits.
'Kids Online Safety Act' will deliberately target trans content, senator admits.
Senator Marsha Blackburn has said the Kids Online Safety Act will 'protect minor children from the transgender in our culture'.
'Kids Online Safety Act' will deliberately target trans content, senator admits.::undefined
Of course it will. Then once they have all the trans people rounded up they’ll target the gays, then the blacks, the mexicans, and so on and so forth until everyone’s in camps that isn’t white.
Republican supporters won’t wake up to this until they start coming after the stupid and obese.
171You're not safe even if you're white. If nothing else they'll target people who like the color blue just to keep some "enemy" in their sights.
White people are just further down the list of easy targets. At that point they'll start by hair color and nitpick their way down from there.
67Fascism requires an "other" to function. Once one "other" is a destroyed there will always be another one to take it's place.
28Working backwards, we could reasonably expect Italian, Irish, and Polish people. Discrimination really isn't about the color of your skin if history is anything to go off of.
2
Permanently Deleted
24they'll never target the stupid, those are the people who will support them no matter what. They're already trying to demonize intelligence and education.
the bar for what counts as stupid enough will continue to lower, though.
12True. The dumbification of America has been going on for years.
2
It’s not about colour anymore, it’s the return of classism.
7the return of classism.
The return? It never left.
4
The bill – endorsed by president Joe Biden – aims to put in place...
0
"The bill – endorsed by president Joe Biden..."
Why in the world would Biden support this Heritage foundation garbage?
80'Kids Online Safety Act' will deliberately target trans content, senator admits
He's a granddad. We shouldn't have granddads who can't work a remote be president. I assume he can't work a remote.
37This IS Biden. He's always been a pretty bad human person. The only silver lining is that he's been better than most recently. He's a center-right politician just like most Democrats.
34Are you starting to see the cracks in the foundation? Are you starting to see how the game is played?
15This is actually a fantastic example of typical politics, but not in the way you're imagining. It's a classic poison pill. Write a bill with something good (protecting children's privacy online, which I think we'd all agree is good) and then put something unpalatable into it (transphobia and homophobia).
Someone votes for it, "Why do you hate LGBT people?" Someone votes against it, "Why don't you want children to have stronger privacy laws on the Internet?"
It's exhausting and a lose-lose. That said, I prefer if they don't vote for it and take heat for "being anti privacy". You don't negotiate with people's rights.
54
$$$$$$$$$$
10Are you not at all familiar with the man and his political history?
8Because he is an old senile man
8He's desperate to look bipartisan
4Permanently Deleted
3Biden has hurt blacks more than any larper nazi today.
1
"Trans porn must be curropting children because it's all I watch now and my mind is way stronger than a child's." -Marsha Blackburn
70...and my mind is stronger than a child's...
It's not though. It really, really isn't.
9
I mean, at this stage you can tell that by the name.
These deplorables love children so much that they don’t even bat an eye at using child sexual abuse as a political tool while simultaneously turning a blind eye to 300,000 children raped by clergy.
61Or children starving because they have to pay for shitty food at school, or children starving and having a bad life because their parents can't afford to pay for more even if they already work, or children at orphanages...
Yeah, much like with forbidding abortion (but then never caring whether the no longer-aborted child will have a proper home to live), children are just a political tool.
4
It should be the parents' job to regulate what kind of content their children consume on the internet, not the government's.
36Permanently Deleted
1
Yep exactly as we all knew.
She wants to confine children like I was to the years of confusion and alienation I had to go through. That’s cruel. I should not have had to feel so alone and nobody else should either.
34It is more than just cruel. It is abusive and genocidal. LGBT youth will die because of this law and the countless others being passed in certain states.
22Oh absolutely and they’ll likely try to punish those who try to save them
15
Not a surprise. That is the intention.
33This isn't about protecting kids it's about banning LGBT persons from the internet.
32We should protect the children, lets start with the Catholic Church.
28and the child mutilating church
1
Send your message to Congress. Here is a simple way to do so. https://resist.bot/petitions/PCCXRJ
20How about we go after the real threat, churches.
20Why is it always the Save The Children Act and not the Erradicate Trans People Act?
10Kind of like Citizens United, has a better ring than "Politician pay offs".
7
This woman is the literal devil...
9Its not a bug, its a feature.
6This is a classic GOP move. Name a bill something like "Free Americans for Internet Freedom Act" that prevents net neutrality and idiots love the name and support it. Name a bill something like "Kids Online Safety Act" as a way to censor and control information, and idiots love the name and support it
4This is great news. Hopefully this makes headlines everywhere and this abomination of an Act can be thrown out.
3These fools are about to walk into some of the most handsome/beautiful 'traps' and when they try to hide their hard nips and erections, the internet will collectively turn to them, adjusting their noose, and say: 'first time, huh?'
2Which only makes sense, trans are the most sus even within the LGBT. Its a broad category of mostly nonsense identities or simply just people unable to cope with how they are born and lamenting over it and passing on that stupidity to children. There are trans who act and blend like any other human being but most are just plain psychological disaster. The unnatural spike in identity disorder proves it.
Edit: Heh, not a single reply. Just downvote for the sake of it cuz I said nothing wrong scientifically and statistically.
1Good
-26Listen to the facist sing
"Take hope here
War is elsewhere
You were chosen
This is Gods land
Soon we'll be free
Of blot and mixture
Seeds planted by our Forefathers hand"
A mass of promises
Begin to rupture
Like the pockets Of the new world kings
Like swollen stomachs In Appalachia
Like the priest that fucked you as he whispered holy things
A mass of tears have transform the stones now
Sharpened on suffering
And woven into the slings
Hope lies in the rubble of this rich fortress
Taking today what tomorrow never brings
5Please explain?
2
good.
-28Do you carry all that hate around with you all the time, or are you just making today a special day?
9Eat shit fascist
2
which is good. kids should not get influenced or make any decision at such age.
-31If you grew up without anything influencing you, you're either an inanimate object or a cat (those bastards don't give a fuck)
Good luck not being influenced by your surroundings. If you feel you haven't, you're blind
16Ooooo totally because I (straight) was totally influenced by my gay uncle and other gay stuff I’ve seen online 🙄
While we’re at it we should get rid of cartoons because kids shouldn’t see stuff like someone slowly falling with an umbrella and trying it in real life since they’re influenced.
Just because someone is exposed to something at a young age doesn’t mean they’ll end up making decisions.
11I've always thought that about religious youth programs. How is that not indoctrination of the youth?
10I agree.
0
So all straight and cis content should be banned too, right, or is it only "degenerate" (to use the word the nazis used) content that should be influencing them?
(straight cis white man speaking. I don't have a horse in this race, but I'm sure not going to let people act like they have the moral high ground without them investigating their beliefs themselves.)
7Permanently Deleted
4Yall said the same thing about some of us being gay. Turns out when used all of the same talking points back then, we were still gay. I was influenced to not be gay, because gay people are disgusting pedophiles who worship Satan, and I ended up gay despite not being a pedophile or worshiping Satan.
2First of all, kids will question their gender and sexuality whether you like it or not - internet or no internet. Secondly, the Internet is a safe haven for lgbtq+ kids and taking away those supportive communities is going to be nothing but harmful. What evidence do you have that exposure to lgbtq+ communities "corrupts" children? I'm guessing none because it just doesn't. Be better.
1