UAW preparing the US for a general strike in 2028
UAW preparing the US for a general strike in 2028
Auto workers ask other unions in other industries to collaborate with them to "take on the billionaire class."
Mark your calendars
LETS FUCKING GOOOOOO
101Best news I've heard all year! A general strike is probably one of our best ways to radicalize the masses. I'm fuckin pumped
35
Let's fucking go. They've worked hard to gut the strength unions used to wield with the POWER of the general strike. Time to bring it back baaaby.
80A general strike would result in the fall of the federal government. Secondary action is illegal because it's so powerful. This is an interesting way to get around that, with every contract just happening to align with the other.
46At this rate though, the federal government is about to result in the fall of the federal government.
40I would blame the people who have stated publicly that they want the federal government to fall.
10
What does secondary action mean, in this context?
10After primary action and just before tertiary action.
(Im sorry, I also dont know and Im just saving this spot for when someone actually explains it)
7Lemmy commenters like to think they are being slick and discrete while still making subtle calls for violence.
1
Yay for more strikes!
Obligatory merchandising here, but you can support our union's effort during the strike by buying some swags in the link below.
46FINALLY
38... in 5 years.
13This is a really smart thing, though. Any unions that align contract dates with UAW and others who also do so, gains a huge lever to use both now and later.
18He's speaking as a union rep, I get what you're saying but he just can't call a general strike. It would take years alone to get different trade union contracts to align to expire on the same year to get what he wants to do across. For example I'm in a steelworker union and my contract expires in 2027. If we sign a new contract in 2027 and participate in a general strike it wouldn't be backed by our union and could be punishable. However if they vote to extend the current contract 1 year near the end of the contract (very likely) we would actually have steelworkers and auto workers contracts expiring on the same year which could be interesting if these assholes actually communicated with each other union to union.
Sorry if you knew all this but I took your comment as in a "why not sooner?" or "what are they waiting for?" context so I felt compelled to answer.
17
5 years too late, we need action today. Let's get it rolling sooner than that.
9Word, why in 2028? I dropped $10 on bread today that used to be $6!!! (Allergies)
2
... is this satire? Why the fuck would you give four years of warning for managers to document "a slow accumulation of poor performance" and other bullshit to shit can pro-union employees. A large strike takes coordination, but four years is ridiculous.
374 years seems reasonable to me. It takes most organizations six months to do literally anything outside the status quo. A general strike is an attempt to organize a coalition of federations of organizations.
Why the fuck would you give four years of warning for managers to document “a slow accumulation of poor performance” and other bullshit to shit can pro-union employees.
This is the reality of striking. The threat and build up to the strike are just as important as the actual strike, because it's about more than just not going to work; it involves complex and wide-ranging logistical question, from how to support the strikers (otherwise corps can just wait you out) to how to decide on a single list of demands.
The very real threats you describe are what make outspoken union advocates awesome and brave people that we should all look up to, and it's why we all have a responsibility to express solidarity and never cross a picket line. Together we bargain; alone we beg!
79The reasoning you described can be summed up very simply: UAW doesn't want to strike, they want changes. And they hope the threat alone is enough to get them.
49Permanently Deleted
13
Nah I think it's a good move. Gives unions time to decide on demands and get big enough to really scare those in power.
38I know you seemed to have gotten the gist for why it's been announced so far out, but there's some other things at play here.
- Actual general strikes are illegal under the Taft-Hartley act
- US unions generally engage in contract negotiations at different times, and set the specific date the contract expires during the negotiation
- In a country of 333 million people, a general strike will take A LOT of planning. Even if only 10% of the country went on strike, it would easily be the largest strike in world history. The entire economy will stop and people will need to be taken care of.
32Even if only 10% of the country went on strike, it would easily be the largest strike in world history. The entire economy will stop and people will need to be taken care of.
I am not brash enough to assert any prediction, but such an event as you describe would be momentus, of coordinating protection and distribution on so massive a scale, completely alternative to the systems of the establishment. A successful demonstration of such kind would be transformative in our culture, producing an unprecedented expansion of collectively perceived horizons of possibility for the future.
4
Solidarity and action requires communication. There's NO way to coordinate that type of collective action and keep it secret.
Much better to say it loud and often to build support.
29Do you know how long union agreements usually last? 3-5 years.
22Yeah, they are just letting the companies know that they will be ready for the next round and that they aren't going to accept less than their value like they were in past negotiations.
20That makes a lot more sense. Thanks!
4
Read the article. The UAW has just signed a ~5 year contract, expiring in 2028. He's calling for other unions, between now and then, to align their contract expirations with the UAW's. This is not something that's possible to do in a short period of time, because it relies upon various other union contracts ending, and realistically by the time we get to 2026/2027 no union is going to sign a sub-2 year contract.
It's kind of dumb, I kind of think they're doing it for PR, but it also is a reasonable strategy.
14I imagine part of it is to try and take the time to gather as much support as possible, likely to include re-educating ground level bootlicker employees who hate unions and their own self interests.
10
Would be interesting. A peaceful general strike would lead to military intervention in about 45-60 days I think.
26I'd say less than a week. Capitalism is something that we have to wake up and make happen every single day. How many days worth of food does the average person have? Definitely not 45 days. People would have to start self-organizing within 2-3 days, and in doing so, they would actively make something that isn't capitalism, which directly challenges those in power.
This is why every time there are emergencies or protests, the media is obsessed with "looting." If there's no food because of a hurricane or whatever, it is every single person's duty to redistribute what there is equitably. The news and capitalists (but I repeat myself) call that "looting," even when it's a well-organized group of neighbors going into a closed store to distribute spoiling food to hungry people.
Rebecca Solnit writes about this in detail in A Paradise Built in Hell. It's really good. She's an awesome writer.
48The publicity offers a motive for entry into local organization by many not yet joined.
Current conditions, as of today, would leave much of the population vulnerable, in case of loss of the established order, and much of the rest inclined to the brutality that produces such vulnerability.
2
And what is the military going to do? Force everyone back to work under the threat of death? Sounds like the catalyst to a revolution to me
21Sooner or later, someone in the military would have to decixe between following an order, and not shooting a friend/relative. And as you say... revolution.
2
That long? Ain't no way the shareholders would let the government stay on its leash long enough to tank an entire fiscal quarter
Will somebody think of the economy?!
12
Unfortunately the Taft-Hartley act made political and solidarity strikes unlawful. Solidarity strike ≈ General strike. There are some very minor differences, but I don't see that mattering.
20What are they going to do, throw the entire working population in jail?
31If I had to guess, I'd say the actual answer isn't jail but "start shooting" while also pumping propoganda about those lazy union guys who just don't want to work.
2
All the effective strikes are illegal.
17Fucking exactly. We're only allowed to have small relief valves to prevent riots, we aren't allowed to actually fight for a better future.
13
Interesting that it was a Republican sponsored bill, and voted in by a Republican Senate and House.
Also interesting that the President Truman had vetoed it.
10A political, solidarity, secondary strike etc. is where a union or group under an in-force bargaining agreement are not allowed to strike just because their friends/fellow workers are striking. While not under a collective agreement then they can strike. If everyone's agreement expires simultaneously, then it is possible for any or every group to strike.
6Okay. The police will just have to arrest hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people all across the country then.
3An interesting read, thank you for sharing.
The anti-communism slant in the law was slightly humorous to read, as it shows you the times in which the law was written.
3
IUOE Local 1 Standing by...
7Yeah!
What does that mean?
2International Union of Operating Engineers
3
Tiocfaidh ár lá Shawn Fein
2