Watch: Billionaire CEO says unemployment 'has to jump' to put 'arrogant' workers in their place
Watch: Billionaire CEO says unemployment 'has to jump' to put 'arrogant' workers in their place
Fuck this cunt
In the face...
Repeatedly...
With a brick!
Or an anchor!
Unemployment has to jump 40 to 50 percent, in my view. We need to see some pain in the economy. We need to remind people that they work for the employer, not the other way around
What a fucking asshole! True "we need to show those uppity peasant who's boss" energy 🤬
Employee and employer work TOGETHER. I would love to meet this guy in person, real let them eat cake energy. Anyway, where's my guillotine sharpener.?
Employee and employer work TOGETHER
Sounds like commie talk to me. How long have you been a member of the Communist Party of America? /s
When we have nothing to lose, then we have no problem eating the billionaires.
If billionaires ruined the economy in such a way that 50 percent of people couldn’t afford to feed their families then I like to think that people would simply eat the billionaires.
But that’s wishful thinking and seeing how people interact in public and online makes me think that way too many people still think billionaires are awesome.
If billionaires ruined the economy in such a way that 50 percent of people couldn’t afford to feed their families
What do you mean "if"? They're well on the way already and it's getting worse, not better.
then I like to think that people would simply eat the billionaires.
Problem with that is that owning everything also includes bodyguards and even de facto private armies.
way too many people still think billionaires are awesome.
Unfortunately you're absolutely right.
i think this guys face should meet a crowbar
That's a weird way to spell guillotine
Guillotine was the bourgeoisie tool to separate the head from their necks. The current ruling class is the modern iteration of that bourgeoisie. I think that the wall and a Kalashnikov would be much more representative of the tools of the proletariat.
It looks like it already has
well since he failed to learn from it maybe they should repeat the lesson.
I hope this isn't a bannable comment, but someone needs to bring out the fucking guillotine for these fucks.
We should indeed have more unemployed people, since we should strive to a world where nobody has to work anymore.
Implement Universal Basic Income.
Or we could just get rid of money and everyone gets what they need? Like, money is just something we made up.
Good luck getting anyone means to give up something without getting something.
I'm pretty sure if you got rid of money people would immediately reinvent it.
I hate cleaning and I pay someone to do it for me. What am I going to do? Barter?
The problem isn't money it's lack of worker protections and consolidation of power.
Welcome to North Korea!
UBI with capitalist relations of production is simply not sustainable.
Where would UBI come from if nobody is working?
Automated production.
It is easier to see the extinction of humanity than the end of capitalism. But if we cannot imagine the end of capitalism we will see the extinction of humanity.
Eventually, though (as Sophie From Mars speculates) the population will be reduced to where the USD and EU are meaningless, and the remaining bands act more like mutual aid.
The question is if humanity has been reduced by then to tens of millions, or thousands.
UBI in imperialist countries comes from the global south people labour.
Unemployment needs to jump 40-50%??? Is this guy seriously that utterly disconnected with reality? In Aus it’s never hit more than 12% in the last 4 decades, the economy would just collapse if unemployment got that high. It only got to 32% during the Great Depression in the US.
That's the difference between percentage and percentage points. If the unemployment rate were 5% then a 50% increase would make it 7.5%
An increase of 50 percentage points would make it 55%
utterly disconnected with reality
is there another way to accumulate that amount of wealth?
having said that, if unemployment is 10% and he thinks it needs to jump (and not to be 50%) then unemployment would be at 15%
If unemployment is 10%, then the actual amount of people who aren't employed anywhere is 50%. Because the laborforce participation rate is only 60% of the population.
His wording means it should increase 40-50%. Not that it should be 40-50%.
Do you know what percentages are?
The guillotine building industry has to jump to put these corporate dirtbags in their place
Stock market needs to go down to put arrogant Billionaire in their place.
that hurts a lot more people than just billionaires
So does the unemployment rate going up.
But at least it hurts billionaires, which the whole world can cheer about.
The ruling class has clearly shown that the economy and the stock market are not as interconnected as they have been in the past. The markets are terribly inflated, it NEEDS to go down, or the eventual crash is going to be 1920's bad.
This is the original "stop eating smashed avocado on toast" guy.
This guy need to improve the planet by being a lot less alive.
About 100% less should do the trick.
I live in his city and I will not hesitate to tip my $6.50 latte over his narcissistic noggin, should the opportunity arise.
"We need to see unemployment rise," he argued. "Unemployment has to jump 40 to 50 percent, in my view. We need to see some pain in the economy. We need to remind people that they work for the employer, not the other way around... There's been a systemic change where the employees feel that the employer is extremely lucky to have them, as opposed to the other way around."
You love to see it.
Also, lots of comments about guillotines here. We might get some concern trolls about that, but at the very least, it sure is a problem when a billionaire like Tim feels like he can say something so outrageous without any consequences.
Funny thing that we witnessed in Iran: Violence is not the answer until the very hour it is.
Law enforcement in Georgia are attacking mutual aid stations. They're recognizing and harassing the non-violent methods we would affect change.
And the billionaires are telling us they'd have us starve if we refuse to live as bonded servants.
This is how civil wars start.
People become violent when they no options for anything. The Syrian Civil War is a prefect example of this, in the lead up the civil war, there was economic polices that benefited a select few people, intense drought that drove food prices up for the common people, and a lack of way to show anger in a healthy democratic way (strikes, protests, etc.), lead to a lot of anger. The anger eventually exploded causing a civil war.
Right now, we all have a cost of living crisis ongoing, lack of political leadership to resolve these issues, and growing wealth inequality. The next global recession is going to have lot of angry people, who's only options are going to be die a slow death or do something and maybe die a slow death.
When it happens remember to direct your anger at the right groups of people, political leaders who championed the status quo for corporations and billionaires, talking heads who tell us to be "grateful", and corporations and billionaires focused on wealth hoarding. These people got us into this mess and will gladly leave all of us to sink if it means they get to keep their dirty hands on power.
When you vote, you are exercising political authority, you're using force. And force, my friends, is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived.
--Robert A. Heinlein
I hope he loses everything he has, and if he doesn't, I hope people steal what's left.
Any consequences! Exactly that. I'm sick of this rich man culture of fuck you I got mine. There needs to be a systematic change where the rich feel that they are extremely lucky to be allowed to horde so much and keep there heads. They've grown lazy and arrogant. Consequences for your selfish actions!
Rich people are loosing the fear of workers that was deeply ingrained in their DNA by the french. They should be afraid again. Maybe pinata economy is the most logic way to go.
The "left" is anti-violence and law-abiding. Our primary act is bringing out old phrases like, "eat the rich."
We're not even hearing of acts of vandalism or sabotage, but we want them to be scared.
Right now, if they don't get their way, unquestioning and at cheap rates, they are oppressed.
This is where we are. I agree, they need checked. Unions are getting stronger again (at last). But that's all I'm seeing. I hope I'm missing something.
i hate these greedflation causing piece of shits. complete and total arrogance. admiral klancy said it best
Can we bring out the guillotines already? Serious.
Unemployed Aussies should show up at his house.
Lol. I actually read the article and it's Tim fucking Gurner.
I've got friends who work as consultants for his projects and it's more of a "do as I say" relationship. He buys up properties and then turns them into "luxury" apartments or hotels for his rich mates.
He's part of our affordable housing crisis.
And he goes on to make this statement. Good grief.
Billionaire has to jump....
Off a cliff
A few Putin jumps of our billionaires is the only way anything's going to change.
Pierre
Get the guillotine
These retarded rich fucks don't really understand that the only reason society is not killing them yet is because many people have a shitty job which can at least feed them. You take that away and motherfucker hungry people will revolt.
But if you consider the counter-argument, maybe arrogant billionaires need to be reminded again that the deal by which they wouldn't be dragged out of their homes and beaten senseless in front of their families was that they'd pay a living wage and deal with unions and submit to antitrust regulations
We never should have accepted such a monstrous Faustian deal in the first place.
Another parasite sucking up all of our resources for itself.
as we know... good billionaire is dead billionaire
As much as I bitch about Lemmy, I am glad to be on a platform where we can openly advocate to put the aristocracy in guillotines without getting banned or otherwise punished for it.
We should seize all his shit
If everyone was unemployed then maybe we'd have the time and desperation to do so :)
That’s what “arrogant” means: not desperate enough. Not sure he knows what fully desperate is though.
On the plus side, people on both sides of the aisle hate this dude.
Ok, lets start by labelling CEO's who don't do shit as "unemployed".
Next is every billionaire that don't pay the taxes they are owed.
Let's eat him first.
The cruelty is the point.
Some CEOs deserve to be fired... out of a cannon... at a brick wall... covered in large spikes.
I'm putting in a proportional amount of effort for my pay compared to what my CEO does for his pay. Seems fair to me.
Nothing like being scolded by a nepo baby!
High time for Pinata Economy.
They realize 40% of the population isn't employed, right?
And I say in order to fix things he should jump off a cliff. Maybe he should try my idea since it only hurts one person instead of millions.
Damn look like that dudes forehead had to jump to get away from his rat face.
Guy's a fucking moron, Australia could not survive such high unemployment - nor could any modern economy.
I hope this entitled cunt has to pay for sex for the rest of his life/
I mean, I have talked with a number of people who know that there are people they work with that are little more than "warm bodies" and get by doing as little as possible while dumping everything they can on someone else. They stay employed because "at least they do something" and there is no one else to do it. Before I get a "low pay" response, these are working professionals and paid accordingly.
It is also a well know economics trend (Phillips curve) that states as unemployed falls, inflation rises. Most countries are underemployed, and it is driving inflation.
Unless he is saying all workers are arrogant and entitled, in which case fuck him.
I would argue that "these working professionals" are not paid accordingly. If you're expecting more of them, pay more. Top talent tends to go where the money is.
If you're wondering where the money should come from, see: out of touch billionaires.
I don't want to go into too much detail, but 1.5 times the countries median wage - not minimum, not living, 1.5 times the countries average income - should be enough to get people to be able to answer a phone and respond to basic emails in a timely matter (like, 24 hours) when people's lives and financial security are on the line.
This isn't a top-talent argument - its acting with a basic sense of actually doing work while you are being paid.
Unless he is saying all workers are arrogant and entitled, in which case fuck him.
That’s a bingo!
If management can't do better than place "warm bodies", I'd say management is overpaid.
Based on the other person im "talking" with maybe management should be paid more to attract the right managers, and maybe management isn't paid enough to do more than the bare basics.
I mean, what's the difference? Both are people paid to do a job, yet change the job title and all of a sudden someone not doing a job shouldn't be paid so much.
Are there shit managers - absolutely. But don't act like employees not doing that they are paid to is acceptable either.
Someone should unemploy him, you know, to help his numbers.
Laughter is the best medicine?
Should be un something for sure.
Unemployment is a luxury that the rich can afford more of.