Clickbait for autistic people
127I had to grit my teeth to restrain myself from looking this up
38
Anyone got a link to the paper? I kinda want to read it
87- 60
Wait, other people don't do that? Well, that explains a lot... Since I was a kid, I never understood how people treated their stuff so badly and throw stuff away without a second thought. I take care of my stuff for as long as I can, and almost never throw anything away. They're like companions who walk with me in my life, and I'm never giving up on an old friend.
69I'm not autistic and I feel the same way. It makes me sad to throw something away if it's still got some use in it.
21I apologize to my things when I accidentally bang them against something.
13Sometimes objects im using have like, a personality and desire? Like they won't want to get thrown out or there's some kind of relationship between two forks.
Its kind of subconscious - I'm only somewhat aware of it. Its weird.
Also when in recalling things Ive learned recently I'll sometimes recall a place I've been to as well. This happens most frequently with code for some reason. Programs I've written or functions will be strongly tied to places in some way? I don't get it.
8Thats probably just an accidental association/linking by your brain. When we learn new things our brain creates neural pathways and these become 'memory'. If there is something that you learn and at the same time it happened to be when you moved to a new house, were on holiday at a different place or perhaps when you met a new person, your brain may go 'you learned this new thing and that place/person/smell/emotion was also there so i will 'save this' together as part of the same memory.
Its like playing a game from your childhood reminding you of the music you were listening to at the time you played it, or a skill you learned reminding you of that awesome dinner you grandma cooked because she was staying with your family at the time.Also when there is strong emotion involved with a memory (excitement, sadness, anger, the first time you kissed someone, etc) then you brain says 'this is very important' and you remember a lot more detail, like the smell of someones perfume and the red car that was parked on the street.
2
Other people also do that
3True. Only the frequency of occurrence that is different.
1
That's part of why I love this song. Same vibes, to me.
1
When I was a kid, every letter and number seemed to have a gender to me.
- Male: a, c, d, e, g, h, j, l, m, n, o, p, x, z, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9
- Female: b, f, i, k, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, y, 3, 7, 8
- NB: 0
49T is male. M is female and dating Mr. N.
13T is a strong, amazonian woman. t is a tomboy skater who likes competitive street boxing.
15
back in the olden times, straight lines were masculine and curved lines were feminine.
7Same for me except my number genders are different. 1,3,5,6,9 are male and 2,4,7,8 are female. 0 is still nb. I'd have to really think about the letters since they are more nuanced. Numbers definitely have hard gender though.
5It's one of those things I didn't really think hard about. It's more like, just the "feeling" I got from them XD.
Not even sure what causes it tbh
3
That sounds like a very unusual form of synesthesia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia
One of the few, if only, mental "disorders" I wouldn't mind having.
4o uses he/they
2
You must now boot up Disco Elysium and go tell the mailbox that everything will be ok.
41/kicks -1hp
7
lemme guess, this paper is probably pay walled also?
God i love modern science, it's so much fun.
27Yes.
22
I hope i don't make the paper sad by saying this but the numbers are kinda off. (Or i misunderstand)
The only real difference is for below age 24. Then its pretty much the same if not less prevalent for autists.
They point to some other factors about the types of questions that indicate that the differences are underestimated but evidently that didn’t translate in hard numbers.
22I think you are misreading this. The age sections at the top are just a demographic breakdown of the two groups. Note rhat all the different percentages for age sum to 100. The results are just the bottom section of your screenshot ("anthromorphic questionnaire"). Does seem to be statistically significant.
10The actual results are in the text. 56% personifiers among autists vs 33% among not autists, p<0.05. Self report is p=0.06.
9I'm pretty sure the age and gender in that table is just showing the frequency of the ages in the sample, not a crosstab of age or gender with personification/anthropomorphism.
So that's saying their autistic population skewed younger than their non-autistic population. Which isn't unsurprising, it's a lot easier to get a diagnosis as a child, and generally easier to get diagnosed now compared to a few decades ago. So people over 35 or so are going to just be less likely to have had the opportunity for diagnosis. The authors do address differences in gender representation between the samples but I don't see age addressed specifically. It could just be that younger people tend to personify/anthropomorphize more, so since the sample of people with autism skewed pretty heavily towards the 16-24 group the results could instead be displaying differences by age. I don't think they quite have the sample size to delve into age too much. I think they'd only be able to get away with doing two groups at 34 & under and 35+. That would be a good start though.
This is also a heavily self-selected population, apparently largely from social media. I'm always automatically skeptical of social media sampling.
I would've liked to see a little more detail about exactly which tests and assumptions they were using. The gender difference looks like they did a t-test, but it's left to the reader to assume they ran a two-tailed t-test. They could easily have bolstered their numbers by reporting the one-tailed test.
8The only real difference is for below age 24. Then its pretty much the same if not less prevalent for autists.
By 24 we learn that people find it weird and stop doing it
5We stop doing it publicly, at home we're always complimenting our inanimate friends.
4
As doctor whatshisorherface said, the first percentage is just showing participant age group, as both lists add up to 100%.
2
Mother fucker....
I personified numbers all the time, 8 and 9 were based off of Smithers and Burns, 4 and 7 were female 4 was more the girl next door, and 7 was more the "Good bad girl"
19I genuinely got separation anxiety after taking my last CRT to the tip.
13
12TIL that Japanese people are all autistic.
edit: an explainer as I can see how this sounds insensitive without context (note that I am not Japanese, this is only from what I have come to understand as an outsider looking in)
Japanese folklore, as Shinto, puts forth the idea that inanimate objects can have (or develop?) their own (personified) spirits. This has carried over to modern behaviour and beliefs, where personification of objects is quite common.
Even if most Japanese don't identify as being of Shinto faith/spirituality, and probably don't believe that random inanimate object X has a living spirit within it, items are often treated with great care as though they were to have a spirit. (theory time: maybe this plays a part in why you can often find used items in such good condition in Japan...)
12I've noticed a lot of things that are considered autistic in the states specifically may be normal practice in various cultures, having worked with people in Germany, and from a large swath of Asia.
It interests me a bit, but I think the takeaway is that autism tends to manifest in a number of quirks, and the ones that don't align with the current culture the autistic person is in are the ones that are paid attention to. That and there tends to be a bit more obsession over said quirks than in those cultures, sometimes to the detriment of the autistic person or their social life.
5I'm a screw and the system just keeps whacking me with a hammer.
3
I came here looking for a discussion about a link between Autism and animism (as being the oldest known spiritual practice).
I think your just talking about animism and confusing the relation
1
I misread autism as one of the coauthors, so
12Albert "Al" Autism. Most famous scientist in his field
7
That title is amazing
10Can someone explain like I'm 5?
8A lot of people with autism feel bad when you hurt an objects feelings, which contradicts the traditional "autism is when no empathy" narrative.
40Thank you for explaining, I understand now. :)
4
Scientific papers are often titled "What it's actually about: something witty." This one is about object personification and so after the colon they personify the paper itself by giving it an emotion.
18Thanks for your response, I appreciate it! That makes sense.
1Oh, that makes sense. I interpreted "sad" as the paper making the person who didn't read it sad, the same way sad music is about making the listener sad than the actual music itself.
0
"This paper will be very sad if you don't read it."
Implying that if you read the paper to avoid making it sad you are autistic.
So it's just one more bad autism joke
1ok shitpost time.
Technically the paper is about the personification of objects in relation to autism.
If you do not read the paper it will be sad. Since it's the paper being sad, and not you thinking that the paper will be sad, technically we could argue that the paper is just lonely and wants somebody to talk to.
7
So Brave Little Toaster's writer probably was ASD?
7A writer whom Kirby scarred somehow
2
Another day, another autism I have...
6Now I have to read the rest
3That poor, sad little paper
6It's going to be happy once I read it all
6
OK, I've been cured of autism
3Let me sum up the concept for you. People who are on the spectrum see the entire world around them as alive. Many often feel a connection to much of their environment. Now as to how the paper see's that ether a positive or a negative I couldn't say because I certainly don't care.
-2That generalization is not necessarily true, from personal experience, I for sure don't think of everything as "alive".
15
