the right wing ethos that boils my blood the quickest is when people drool out shit like 'play stupid games win stupid prizes' under a story about some guy getting brutally beaten by police for being at a protest or stealing a dvd
A right to remain silent.
A right to a competent attorney regardless of ability to pay.
A right to due process.
A right to a timely trial by a jury of peers.
A right to healthy food, shelter, healthcare, and other accommodations while incarcerated.
I'm probably missing a few.
Countries that are known for corruption often have massive bureaucracies that are full of little seemingly inconsequential laws that most people can safely ignore all the time. The result is that nearly everybody's breaking some rule just to function with some level of efficiency in society. In fact if you wanted to follow every rule it would break you.
The result is that whenever a vengeful government official wants to bring someone down all they have to do is investigate for a few minutes and figure out which is the most recent rule that was broken and poof that person's a criminal.
If you don't support the free speech rights of the people you hate the most, then you're against free speech.
Being against free speech is tyrannical. Also...Can you point to any time in history where the people censoring controversial things were the good guys in the ensuing conflict?
Western legal systems are based not on jailing criminals but on keeping the innocent out of jail. This does result in more criminals roaming free but I'll take that a hundred times over the alternative
If you want to rehabilitate prisoners, you need to reintegrate them into society, which means they need to have their civil rights back. Otherwise, why did we bother fighting a war over slavery?
I agree but it's important to differentiate between accused criminals and convicted criminals, and what specific diminution of rights we're talking about. Obviously jury-convicted violent criminals probably will suffer a harsher restriction on their rights than someone accused but not yet convicted of a minor misdemeanor. There will probably be a spectrum of restrictions on rights.
Are there people calling for all rights to be suspended upon indictment? Maybe on the fringes.
Yes, criminals should have rights. But those rights aren't all necessarily the same as those of non-criminal citizens. And when the rights of victims are trampled on in the guise of protecting criminal rights, there's a problem.